10 new sports books for fans

Here are some fascinating sports titles for you or your favorite sports fan.

2. ‘Lost Ballparks,’ by Dennis Evanosky and Eric J.Kos

It’s safe to say that no sport cherishes its playing grounds more than baseball nor waxes more nostalgic about those now gone. And why not? Baseball stadiums not only possess their own distinct character, but their dimensions and quirks literally define the field of play. “Lost Ballparks” is a well-annotated photo gallery that briefly describes the stories of 60 of these dearly departed stadiums and does so chronologically based on when they were demolished. So the timeline begins in 1911, when Cincinnati’s Palace of the Fans, the home of the Reds, came down, and ends in 2015 when Candlestick Park in San Francisco finally bit the dust. Along the way, the books pays homage to both the famous big-league parks – Baker Bowl, Ebbets Field, Three Rivers Stadium, etc. – and such lesser-known minor-league parks as Russwood Park in Memphis, Tenn., and Holcomb Park in Des Moines, Iowa. 

Here’s an excerpt from Lost Ballparks:

“The first D.C. park to last more than a decade was National Park, built in a hurry in 1911. In March of that year the original ballpark, also known as Boundary Field, burned when sparks from a plumber’s blowtorch set the ballpark on fire. The Senators quickly built a replacement which was just about ready to host 16,000 fans and President Taft on opening day in April.

“In 1920, the stadium was renamed after Senators owner Clark Griffith, the only man in major league history to serve as a player, manager and owner for at least 20 years each. Griffith Stadium’s left-field line was an astounding 407 feet away, making it an extremely tough park for right-handed batters, a circumstance that helped Washington’s Walter Johnson become arguably the greatest pitcher in baseball history. It wasn’t until 1957 – four years before the park’s closure – that a Senators player hit 30 homes runs in a season.”

2 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.