'Thunder at the Gates' celebrates 200,000 black Civil War soldiers

Douglas R. Egerton's book is a fantastic performance throughout, with Colonel Robert Gould Shaw and the Massachusetts 54th Volunteer Infantry at its heart.

Thunder at the Gates: The Black Civil War Regiments that Redeemed America By Douglas R. Egerton Basic Books 448 pp.

Perched at the top of Boston Common there's a piece of public artwork every American should see. It's a massive bronze high-relief sculpture by August Saint-Gaudens, and it depicts what at first glance seems like a fairly standard military tableau: a group of Union soldiers marching resolutely forward.

Their leader is on horseback, in their midst, and floating near his left shoulder, hovering just over the field of the soldiers' upturned rifles, is the spirit of victory, guarding the whole enterprise. Thanks to the amazingly supple detailed work Saint-Gaudens employed in the muscles of the horse and the trousers of the troops, the whole tableau almost moves while the viewer watches.

It's only on closer examination that the sculpture's key detail leaps out: These Union soldiers are black men. This is the Massachusetts 54th Volunteer Infantry, the first all-volunteer black regiment to fight in the Union cause. It was created in 1863, and Colonel Robert Gould Shaw, a young son of a wealthy and prominent Boston Brahmin family, was its commander.

Eventually, nearly 200,000 black troops would join the Union ranks before the end of the war, and the story of those regiments is at the heart of Thunder at the Gates, the new book by prolific historian Douglas R. Egerton. It's a fantastic performance throughout, and although it pulls other black units such as the Massachusetts 55th Infantry and the 5th Massachusetts Cavalry into the larger narrative, its pride of place goes to Col. Shaw and the 54th.

A significant percentage of the 54th's personnel, both its officers and its troops, were recruited by Boston abolitionists eager to see former slaves finally taking up arms in President Lincoln's army. But perhaps like many of those officers, Col. Shaw initially had reservations about the whole project. Before he began his command, for instance, he admitted to the uncle of one of his officers that although in his opinion black troops had proven “effective in bush-fighting,” he doubted they'd do as well in battle, and he suggested the possibility of keeping armed white soldiers in their rear to cut off retreat.

Time with his men changed that opinion, and Egerton charts that change and others like it with sensitivity and remarkable readability. This is a landmark study of the true crucible of the American Civil War, when former slaves took up uniforms and weapons in order to fight for their own freedom. Egerton's story ranges pleasingly far from the battlefield – he's equally concerned with the vast and easily underestimated ripple effect news of black regiments had on all precincts of civilian society. (On this aspect another must-read of the season is Chandra Manning's outstanding new book "Trouble Refuge").

He also gives very satisfying accounts of the lives his principal characters led after the war. He follows, for instance, the career of James Monroe Trotter, formerly a second lieutenant of the 54th (and also formerly a slave), who moved to Boston and enmeshed himself in state and national politics, eventually being appointed recorder of deeds in Washington by President Grover Cleveland, a move that, as Egerton quotes the old Boston Evening Transcript, managed to displease people on both sides of the aisle: “The Democrats and Republicans in Congress are almost equally perturbed by it,” the paper wrote, “the former objecting to Mr. Trotter's color, and the Republicans objecting to his politics.”

Trotter, Egerton reminds his readers, was the first black New Englander to receive a high-ranking federal position.

But from a dramatic standpoint, this part of the long history of black emancipation in America will always revolve around the moment that Massachusetts senator and abolitionist Charles Sumner looked back on as “their Bunker Hill,” the moment in which those immortal soldiers of Saint-Gaudens are forever marching up on Beacon Hill: the assault on Fort Wagner in South Carolina on July 18, 1863, when the 54th tried in vain to take a heavily-fortified Confederate position and suffered grievously for their efforts. “Shaw was waving his sword and shouting, 'Forward, my brave boys!' when a bullet caught him in the breast,” Egerton writes. “He was hit five or six more times before he dropped.”  Twenty-nine of his troops were also killed, and 149 were wounded, many mortally. The South held Fort Wagner, but in every important way, the confrontation was a Union victory; it gave a graphic, bitter demonstration – to those on either side who required such demonstrations – that valor is indifferent to skin color, and that the war was actually about shared humanity.

"Thunder at the Gates" is acutely aware that its subject is in many ways ongoing. Egerton's concluding chapter traces the role black soldiers have played in the long shadow of Fort Wagner, through the world wars of the 20th century, to Executive Order 9981, in which President Truman in 1948 ordered the desegregation the US armed forces. But the centerpiece of his tale is the modern-era birth of that story, under fire.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Thunder at the Gates' celebrates 200,000 black Civil War soldiers
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today