Baseball 2016: touching base with seven new books

Here’s an around-the-horn look at a lineup of diverse releases:

4. 'Baseball’s Power Shift: How the Players Union, the Fans, and the Media Changed American Sports,’ by Jon Krister Swanson

American sports fans have long been accustomed to viewing pro athletes as not just players, but as workers with collective bargaining rights. This evolution, however, did not happen overnight. In baseball it was really concentrated in what author Krister Swanson identifies as the turbulent years between 1966 and 1981. Helping to start the ball rolling was a decision by Dodger pitching greats Sandy Koufax and Don Drysdale to jointly hold out for multiyear contracts with hefty raises. Other developments during this period were three labor strikes, two lockouts, Curt Flood’s court challenge of the reserve clause, and ultimately the introduction of free agency and the itinerancy of many of the biggest names in the game. 

Here’s an excerpt from Baseball’s Power Shift:

“The Players Association did not have to wait long to find the perfect test case for a legal challenge to the reserve clause. The St. Louis Cardinals, disappointed at the outcome of the 1969 season, traded star outfielder Curt Flood to the Philadelphia Phillies in exchange for Richie Allen, a power-hitting first baseman. Flood was a bright, respected, thirteen-year veteran, a man many believed to be one of the premier outfielders of the era. It was also not insignificant, in this time of national upheaval over racial equality, that Flood was black, born in Houston, Texas, and raised in Oakland, California. While he was not a militant activist in sympathy with the Black Panthers, Flood was certainly well aware of the gains and frustrations of the civil rights movement. Flood’s was a life shaped by the hands of bigotry and segregation. He played two years in the Minor Leagues in the Deep South, where the only available housing was a college dormitory restricted to African Americans.”

4 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.