7 football books for midseason reading: Brady, Manning, Montana, and more

Here are seven new interesting football titles.

5. ‘So You Think You Know Football: The Armchair Ref’s Guide to the Official Rules,’ by Ben Austro

Is it any wonder why some NFL telecasts now bring in former referees and rules experts to explain the details and complexities of calls on the field? It’s not easy even for the broadcasters to know the NFL rulebook cold, and certainly even serious fans welcome an opportunity to expand their knowledge of the rules, how they came be, and learn from case studies from actual games. Ben Austro delivers this in his armchair guide to NFL rules, which draws on his work as founder and editor of Football Zebras, a website dedicated to rule interpretations. A sampling of the topics covered: what constitutes a legal and illegal formation, intentional grounding, fair catches, and the perplexing “ten second runoff.”

Here’s an excerpt from So You Think You Know Football:

“In the cavernous Los Angeles Coliseum, the Rams unveiled a unique field goal blocking tactic when the Bears visited on October 30, 1955. As George Blanda was about to attempt a field goal, Blanda saw Rams safety Don ‘the Blade’ Burroughs looming much taller than the 6-foot-4 in the game program. Burroughs was standing on defensive tackle Eugene ‘Big Daddy’ Lipscomb, listed as 6-foot-7, as Lipscomb held Burroughs’s feet at waist level. Blanda’s kick was unaffected by the wobbling tower of Burroughs and Lipscomb, and the field goal was good.

“Is this a legal play?

“At the time, the play was legal, despite being outlawed in the college game after Oregon State University attempted a self-illustratively named pyramid play in 1933. It is now prohibited under multiple provisions of the unsportsmanlike conduct rule, which include jumping or standing on a teammate or opponent and picking up a teammate in order to block a kick.”

5 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.