'Pride and Prejudice': 5 things you may not know about the classic novel

It is a truth universally acknowledged that Jane Austen is universally loved, even 200 years after the publication of her most popular novel, “Pride and Prejudice.” Two centuries after Ms. Austen published the beloved novel, Austenites are kicking off a yearlong bicentennial celebration of “Pride and Prejudice,” complete with read-a-thons, “pop-up” theatrical performances, essay contests, exhibitions, and of course, a BBC-filmed reconstruction of Netherfield Ball, where Elizabeth Bennet met Mr. Darcy. Nonetheless, as intimately familiar as Austenites have become with the widely-read novel, we’ve uncovered some secrets about “Pride and Prejudice.” Here, we present five things you didn’t know about “Pride and Prejudice.”

1. 'Pride and Prejudice' was almost published as 'First Impressions'

A 21-year-old Austen attempted to publish the book under that title in 1797 before it was significantly revised and published under the now-familiar title in 1813, possibly to avoid confusion with other works entitled “First Impressions.” “Pride and Prejudice” was most likely taken from a passage of Fanny Burney’s 1782 novel, “Cecelia,” which heavily used that now-popular phrase: “The whole of this unfortunate business... has been the result of pride and prejudice... If to pride and prejudice you owe your miseries, so wonderfully is good and evil balanced, that to pride and prejudice you will also owe their termination.”

1 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.