2 novels about dysfunctional families on vacation

Ah, the vacation home. They look so peaceful in the brochure pictures – you know, without all the people there. Add a bunch of extended relatives, squabbling and resenting the heck out of one another, and you have an idyllic setting in which to work through decades of old hurts and long-simmering slights. Two new novels use roughly the same principle: Take a vacation house – one in Wales, and one off the coast of Cape Cod – cram them full of people, and sit back and watch the human comedy unfold.

1. 'The Red House'

Mark Haddon has never had a problem with empathy. He sprang to international prominence with his first literary novel, “The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time,” which was written from deep inside the viewpoint of an autistic child.

In “The Red House,” his third novel for grown-ups, an estranged family spends a week in the Welsh countryside. The point of view cuts abruptly from one character to character – sometimes Haddon spends only a few paragraphs with one before bouncing to another. The fragmented approach takes a few pages to adjust to, but once each character is distinctly drawn, it's pretty easy to figure out whose thoughts you're eavesdropping on.

Angela and Richard haven't spent more than afternoon together in 15 years. “They'd never felt like brother and sister, just two people who spoke briefly on the phone every few weeks or so to manage the stages of their mother's decline.”

After their mother dies, Richard, a physician who recently remarried a woman, Louisa, with a teenage daughter, invites Angela and her husband, Dominic, and their three children on a weeklong vacation to Hay-on-Wye. Befuddled, but unable to afford a holiday of their own, they accept.

Once in Wales, Richard and Angela predictably spar about who had the tougher childhood and who was more devoted to their alcoholic mother, but there's much more going on under the surface. While Richard's life looks the most successful on the surface, he is facing a malpractice trial when he gets back to Edinburgh, and, unbeknownst to her parents, his stepdaughter, Melissa, will be walking into major repercussions over a cyberbullying “prank” that went very wrong.

Angela, now the main breadwinner of her family, is still grieving over her stillborn daughter, born 18 years earlier. Dominic is hiding his own secrets. Their son, Alex, an outdoorsman, is trying to figure out the best approach to hit on his new cousin. Daisy is going through a devout phase that infuriates her mother, who wonders if all the ostentatious Christianity isn't hiding a trauma. And little Benjy wants to sword fight and visit real castles.

“The normal rules had been temporarily suspended,” and the week away from familiar habits and environs is just long enough for everyone (except maybe Benjy) to snipe and flirt and quarrel, and maybe, for a lucky few, take stock of themselves.

1 of 2

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.