2 excellent new novels, both set during the Korean War

"Home" by Toni Morrison and "The Coldest Night" by Robert Olmstead both argue for greater attention to the Korean War.

2. The Coldest Night

In his earlier novels like “Coal Black Horse” and “Far Bright Star,” Olmstead made stark studies of the Civil War and the Mexican-American War.

Now, in The Coldest Night, Olmstead turns from 19th-century American conflicts to the Korean War, this time enlisting a protagonist who is a descendant of his previous protagonists. (Olmstead mentions “coal black horses” twice in his opening pages to get across the connection to his earlier work; unfortunately he leaves readers with a bleak image of the young boy who survived the Civil War as a 91-year-old whose entire family has fled his mountain. I could have lived without that sad epilogue as an introduction.)

Seventeen-year-old Henry Childs grew up in West Virginia, the only son of a single mom who worked as a nurse. He loved baseball and horses and Mercy, the daughter of a local judge. Mercy’s dad, however, wasn’t having any of it. Henry and Mercy run away together to New Orleans before her family can catch up with them, although – of course – they finally do.

Brokenhearted, Henry lies about his age and enlists in the Marines as a “hunter,” armed with a Browning automatic rifle. Like his ancestors, Henry is extremely good at soldiering, but it will take every milligram of skill he’s got to survive the Chosin Reservoir, a frozen nightmare of a battlefield Olmstead renders with epic skill.

The love story is, it must be said, the weakest part of “The Coldest Night.” Mercy isn’t nearly as fully realized a companion for Henry as is his fellow sniper, Lew, a World War II veteran from the same town in Charleston, W.Va.

But put Olmstead on a battlefield and stand back. The writing is powerful and the imagery stark. Readers will find that the forgotten war roars back to life again in the pages of Olmstead’s excellent novel. 

2 of 2

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.