Teach the Bible in public schools
BOSTON — Although the 110th Congress has brought to Capitol Hill 43 Jews, two Buddhists, and a Muslim, Washington remains a disproportionately Christian town. More than 90 percent of federal legislators call themselves Christians, making Congress more Christian than the United States itself. Biblical references permeate political speech, yet US citizens know almost nothing about the Bible. Although most regard it as the word of God, few read it anymore.
In their answers to a religious literacy quiz I have given, undergraduates tell me that Moses was blinded on the road to Damascus and that Paul led the Israelites on their exodus out of Egypt. Surveys that are more scientific have found that only 1 out of 3 US citizens is able to name the four Gospels, and 1 out of 10 think that Joan of Arc was Noah's wife.
Biblical illiteracy is not just a religious problem. It is a civic problem with political consequences. How can citizens participate in biblically inflected debates on abortion, capital punishment, or the environment without knowing something about the Bible? Biblically illiterate Americans are easily swayed by demagogues on the left or the right who claim – often incorrectly – that the Bible says this about war or that about homosexuality.
One solution to this civic problem is to teach Bible classes in public schools. By Bible classes I do not mean classes in which teachers tell students that Jesus loves them or that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, but academic courses that study the Bible's characters and stories, and the afterlife of the Bible in literature and history. Recently, the Georgia Board of Education gave preliminary approval to two elective Bible courses designed to teach, rather than preach, religion. As long as teachers stick to the curriculum, this is a big step in the right direction.
The most common objection to such courses is that they are unconstitutional. But the Supreme Court has repeatedly given a constitutional stamp of approval to academic courses about religion. In 1963, Justice William Brennan wrote in Abington v. Schempp that "the holding of the Court today plainly does not foreclose teaching about the Holy Scriptures." And in 1948, Justice Robert Jackson wrote in McCollum v. Board of Education that "a course in English literature that omitted the Bible ... would be pretty barren."
But barren of the Bible is just what our public school curricula are. According to a study by the Bible Literacy Project, which publishes a Bible textbook for secondary schools, only 8 percent of US high school students have access to an elective Bible course. As a result, an entire generation of Americans is growing up almost entirely unable to understand the 1,300 biblical allusions in Shakespeare or the scriptural oratory of President Lincoln and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
Some have argued against Bible courses in public schools on the theory that they would unconstitutionally "establish" Judeo-Christianity. For Scripture courses to be lawful, this argument goes, teachers must give equal time to all the world's scriptures. But the Bible is of sufficient importance in Western civilization to merit its own course. Treating it no differently from, say, Scientology's "Dianetics" makes no educational sense.
What makes sense is one Bible course for every public high school student in the US. This is not a Christian proposal. It does not serve the political left or the political right. It serves our young people and our public life.
• Stephen Prothero is chairman of the religion department at Boston University and the author of "Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know – and Doesn't." ©2007 Los Angeles Times Syndicate.