Londoners were preparing defiantly to get back to business Monday after the horror of last Thursday's quadruple bombings, amid palpable jitters of a repeat strike and a growing debate about how to keep terrorists at bay.
Officials believe the near-simultaneous rush-hour attacks on the Tube were not the result of suicide attacks but devices deliberately left in bags. A fourth attack on a bus may also have been planted. The implication is that the terrorists, thought to be a small cell of Islamist radicals, possibly Britons, are still at large.
Police and security services are mounting one of their biggest ever investigations, hoping that assiduous forensic work and hundreds of hours of closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage will pinpoint the perpetrators of what has been dubbed "7/7."
Experts note the similarities with the March 2004 Madrid train bombings. In that case, investigators found further explosives and signs of more terror plots, and cornered the gang in a violent confrontation in which the suspects blew themselves up.
"These people will be desperate to escape," says Shane Brighton, a security expert with the Royal United Services Institute, a think tank in London. "They are dangerous when being pursued."
But he added: "What seems to be the case with these Al Qaeda attacks is that when you have one of them, there doesn't seem to be another straight afterward."
Police are taking no chances on that front. Significantly, Spanish forensic teams are helping with the London inquiry. The wholesale evacuation of Birmingham city center on Saturday night, an alert at Heathrow Airport Sunday, and the heightening of the general terror alert to the highest notch indicated a society on edge.
"Our fear is that there will be more attacks until we succeed in tracking down the gang who committed the attacks," said Charles Clarke, the home secretary.
Intelligence officers within MI5 and MI6 are believed to be concentrating their focus on the electronic and airwave "chatter" that often precedes such events. The police effort, meanwhile, has concentrated on forensic investigations and CCTV footage. London is one of the most closely watched city on earth, with thousands of cameras above and below ground.
"There's no doubt that it can help," says Martin Gill, a professor in criminology at Leicester University. "The real advantage of CCTV is that is may be able to help track people throughout London and beyond to pick up evidence."
Two separate claims from groups saying they are affiliates of Al Qaeda have claimed responsibility for the attacks. A former police chief, Sir John Stevens, said the terrorists "will almost certainly be British born and bred," noting that it is believed that perhaps 3,000 Britons have passed through Al Qaeda camps.
Newspapers here are speculating of involvement by the North African cells thought to be behind the outrages of Madrid and Casablanca. And they're wondering if the attacks were timed to spoil the joy of the 2012 Olympics announcement, with a terror cell ready to hit Paris, if it, not London, had won the bid.
"The real debate would be about the type of network that is involved," says Prof. Paul Wilkinson, a terrorism expert at St. Andrews University in Scotland. "Is it homegrown or are there people from overseas who are helping to organize and coordinate it?"
The identity of the perpetrators and attack details are vital for a government desperate to make Britain a harder target for terrorists. Despite rigorous antiterrorist legislation, police had warned before Thursday that an attack was inevitable.
The problem for the government, experts say, is that there is little more they can do. Already they have formidable powers to impose "control orders" on suspects, subjecting them to surveillance, electronic tagging, Internet bans, and even house arrest. Sunday, three people were arrested under the prevention of terrorism act, but police would not link the detentions to Thursday's bombings.
Further initiatives are difficult to conceive, without sacrificing British civil liberties. There aren't many more laws to be passed that haven't already been passed, says Rhiannon Talbot, an expert in terrorism at Newcastle University. "The UK has some of the most stringent antiterrorism laws in the world."
She dismisses the idea that identity cards, which the government already intends to bring in, can make a difference. Instead, she says the government would do better to concentrate on the causes of terror. "You can start thinking about the underlying problems that drive people into signing up to these organizations, and often it's straightforward issues like social exclusion and abuse of rights."
Wilkinson says the authorities should take care not to overreact and not to offend mainstream Muslim sentiment. He says there are things that could be undertaken to strengthen the legal process, allowing the use of electronic intercept evidence in court and using judges who are specially trained for terrorism cases.
Public opinion would appear to be solidly in favor of robust measures to tighten loopholes. A YouGov poll published over the weekend found that 81 percent of people supported taking action against people who have not yet committed any offense, but are under suspicion because of intelligence evidence. Prime Minister Tony Blair's ratings have gone up, and 68 percent said the government was doing well in the battle against terrorism, despite Thursday's attacks.
London endured an emotional weekend after its worst-ever terrorist episode. Half-empty on Friday, it was steeped in mourning for the 49 dead on Saturday, while relatives of the dozens still missing embarked on grim inquiries for information.
Fittingly perhaps, the city was draped in the flag Sunday for the anniversary of a great triumph over terror: the end of World War II. Defiant octogenarians scoffed at terrorists who thought they could achieve what the Nazis couldn't: London's surrender. The Queen vowed that terrorism would not alter Britain's way of life.
Indeed, the British "bulldog" spirit appeared alive and well in some corners. A day after the bombing, a taxi driver put up this sign in his cab: "You can break our hearts, but you cant break our spirit." Roddy, the driver, said: "I've never had so many people agree with me on one day in my entire life."
But at "Underground zero," the makeshift shrine outside King's Cross station, where rescuers are still searching for bodies, the mood was somber.
"It's scary," said Leon Arthur, as he surveyed the flowers piling up. "You're driving along and there's buses going by and you don't know if one of them's going to go off."
Others are concerned about living in a paranoid society, and say that locking down cities and curbing civil liberties would give terrorists an easy victory. "I don't want to be searched every time you go through a gate," says fisherman Lionel Cox, casting his line into Reading's Kennet River. "I don't want to live in a society like that."
• Stephen Humphries in Reading and Robert Marquand in London contributed to this report.