We uncover a plot against good grammar

A SHADY character is skulking around the language of our media: the co-conspirator. If a conspirator is someone who conspires, what is a co-conspirator? It couldn't be an individual who co-conspires, because there is no such verb. Black's Law Dictionary speaks of conspirators as "two or more persons" entering on a criminal offense. (My Random House and American Heritage dictionaries do not even list co-conspirator.)

Perhaps the "co" is to hint at a status of an adjunct conspirator, someone marginally connected with the plot. But that would still make him a "conspirator on the fringes of it."

To conspire literally means to "breathe together." It conjures up an image of plotters in a tight huddle, their breaths blending. "Conspirator" thus implies accomplices, or at least one other comrade in crime. If "lone conspirator" is a contradiction in terms, doesn't "co-conspirator" belong to the likes of "free gift," "advance warning," and "redundant tautology"? An example of this would be "fellow co-conspirator." Maybe we'd better stop before this conspiratorial inquiry gets out of hand.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.