Inside a quiet revolution

This "simplify your life" business can get sort of complicated, unless you're spiritually evolved enough to leave America's get-it-now consumers to their own devices.

Or unless your vision of completeness happens to look as sparse as Ted Kaczynski's cabin.

But it's a topic with currency. There's a widespread belief that life is, by definition, frenetic.

That's certainly debatable. Sure, the economy's fast, but can you really not afford to go to lunch without an electronic leash?

Sounds a little self-important.

Even among those who agree on wanting a "simpler" life, there's debate over how to get there. High-tech, for example, is called either a helpmate or another source of clutter. Something you need just to keep pace - or something you must work harder and longer just to afford.

Most of us inhabit a middle ground between latter-day Luddites and those who view "wearable technology" as a stepping stone to encoded irises and fingertip, microchip implants.

Luddites are losing big. Technology's the ultimate consumer product. Flashy. Trendy. Quick to obsolesce. You start buying, and wind up upgrading. A gadget becomes an integral tool - then gets superseded or "converged." It's easy to get sucked into the vortex.

Today's lead story pinpoints a quiet new countertrend. The latest group to turn toward voluntary simplicity - paring back on consumer technology by choice: some of the high-octane young achievers in the high-tech industry itself.

What's interesting, besides the obvious irony, is that they've joined up without becoming radical rejectionists. Or shedding their stock options. They're just individuals quietly seeking a balance.

*Reach us at

(c) Copyright 2000. The Christian Science Publishing Society

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.