India's Wake-Up Call
The fact of the matter on India's nuclear tests is that the blinding of the United States government stems from its own self-confidence and boastfulness. They were full of contempt for the Indians, as always, thanks to India's Gandhian over-humility. No one really believed that India was capable of detonating atomic bombs.
For 24 long years, India's reticence was translated by these boastful Westerners - in spite of India's Pokhran test in 1974 - as incompetence. In the meantime, China, France, and a number of countries went ahead with atomic blast after blast and no one heard any meaningful protest from the West.
King's killing bears investigation
Regarding Daniel Schorr's column "It's a Sad Day If America Conspires Against Americans" (May 1): Regrettably, Mr. Schorr misuses Coretta Scott King's perfectly credible and proper request that her husband's assassination be investigated by the Justice Department to illustrate his own understandable concern that too many citizens believe hidden conspiracies abound behind many prominent Americans' murders.
The exact circumstances of Martin Luther King Jr.'s passing is clouded in a mystery involving countless bumblings and embarrassing inconsistencies on our government's part which - for the sake of all Americans, not just the King family - it still needs to resolve.
While the author believes Gerald Posner's book leaves little doubt of James Earl Ray's guilt, both he and your readers may find, as I did, that a careful reading of the book by Ray's long-time, tenacious attorney William Pepper raises intriguing unanswered, but answerable, questions. May the Justice Department accept the Kings' request untainted by innuendo.
Harold G. Schick Jr.
News media distracts the president
Godfrey Sperling's column "Clinging Scandal Diverts the President" (May 12) appalled me, for the first time in many years' reading of the Monitor.
Mr. Sperling has written many thoughtful, incisive, and revealing pieces on the personalities and opinions of politicians. But this time he has bought into the gratuitous, collective corrosion of Bill Clinton and his presidency by the media.
I also watched (and listened to) the latest press conference he reports on. I heard the "scandal" questions, and Clinton's careful, yet cutting (if you listened attentively) answers.
But they were not the majority of the questions, and he seemed not diverted. It is the news media, not Mr. Clinton, that is diverted from asking the questions important for the country, indeed the world.
And there are the repeated references to "scandals": Have we forgotten that nothing has been proven? Have we forgotten Mr. Clinton's contributions to the evolving peace process in Northern Ireland, his work on race relations in America, education, environment, etc.?
Or are these diversions away from the President's problems?
I wish that the author could reflect on the real significance of the diversion of the press. Marshall McLuhan was very right: The media are the message.
Hendrik J. Monkhorst
In the editorial "Fill 'er Up!" (April 30) you state that Venezuela is a non-OPEC country. However, Venezuela is one of the six founding members of OPEC.
The Monitor welcomes your letters and opinion articles. Because of the volume of mail, only a selection can be published, and we can neither acknowledge nor return unpublished submissions. All submissions are subject to editing. Letters must be signed and include your address and telephone number.
Mail letters to "Readers Write," and opinion articles to Opinion Page, The Christian Science Monitor, One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115, or fax to 617-450-2317, or e-mail to email@example.com