[ No headline ]


The opinion-page article ''Pure Profit for Landowners at Environment's Ex-pense?'' Feb. 10, should have stated that the Private Property Restoration Act would allow a landowner to seek redress against the federal government whenever a federal law limits a right to real property and causes a ''nonnegligible reduction'' in its ''fair market value.''

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.