Congressional Candidates Spent Big In '94 Vote

REPUBLICANS say their promise to cut the size of government helped them win control of Congress in November. But money played a part, too.

A report this week from the US Federal Election Commission (FEC) shows the Republicans mainly responsible for a surge in campaign spending to a record $589.5 million - an $87.5 million increase over 1992. The jump will renew calls for campaign-finance reform from public-interest groups.

GOP spending on races for the House and Senate rose 29 percent over 1992, going from $227.5 million to $293.6 million. Spending by Democratic candidates grew 8 percent, from $270 million to $292.3 million.

The report confirmed that multi-millionaire businessman Michael Huffington (R) waged the costliest Senate race in history, spending $29.4 million in an unsuccessful bid to unseat Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) of California. He was followed by another GOP loser, Oliver North of Iran-Contra fame, who spent $19.76 million trying to defeat Sen. Charles Robb (D) of Virginia.

The top spender on the House side ($3.1 million) was freshman Rep. Eugene Fotenot (R) of Texas. The new House minority leader, Richard Gephardt (D) of Missouri, came in second at $2.5 million.

The FEC announced that Prudential Securities agreed to pay $550,000, the largest civil penalty the agency has imposed in its 19-year history for election law violations for illegally soliciting campaign funds from its own executives and other businessmen for nine political candidates.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.