`Using chlorine'

Regarding the Associated Press story ``Chlorine: Safe Chemical or Toxic Threat?'' Dec. 15: It reports a 1992 proposal for a phaseout of the industrial use of chlorine in the Great Lakes region. Bonnie Rice of Greenpeace's Chlorine Free Campaign states, ``Using chlorine is going to end life as we know it....''

How do we define the term ``using chlorine''? To clarify the Greenpeace position it would be useful to inquire whether Ms. Rice is referring to free, bound, molecular, free-radical, ionic, or covalent chlorine, the properties of which are vastly different.

Does Rice's unqualified statement relate to the use of chlorine in the purification of drinking water for more than a century? Volcanoes have been puffing out poisonous chlorine gas since before the Pleistocene Epoch.

We need a workable definition of ``using chlorine,'' including an indication of what kind and how much, and less of the currently fashionable knee-jerk reaction to the ``toxic-chemical'' syndrome. Robert B. Henn, Ambler, Pa.

Your letters are welcome. For publication they must be signed and include your address and telephone number. Only a selection can be published, and none acknowledged. Letters should be addressed to ``Readers Write,'' and can be sent by Internet E-mail (200 word maximum) to OPED@RACHEL.CSPS.COM, by fax to 617-450-2317, or by mail to One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.