High court roughs in caseload

The Supreme Court agreed to rule on whether the secretary of state may revoke the passport of a controversial former CIA agent Philip Agee, on grounds he is a national-security risk. Mr. Agee, who now lives in Hamburg, is a vehement critic of the US intelligence agency, and has disclosed the names of nearly 1, 000 CIA agents and other alleged national- security secrets in two books and several articles.

In other decisions, the court:

* Refused to step into the 10-year-old controversy over school busing in Detroit.

* Agreed to review the constitutionality of key portions of the federal strip-mining law requiring reclamation of mined land.

* Agreed to consider how far the government can go in protecting workers from on-the-job health hazards and make a second try at defining the power of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to limit occupational exposure to chemicals and other substances.

* Agreed to consider if the federal election law violates the right of free speech and political association by limiting contributions to political action committees.

* Let stand a ruling that the federal government may require states to provide jobless benefits for state and local government employees.

* Refused to hear a challenge that the National Organization for Women violated anti-trust laws by declaring a boycott against the State of Missouri for not ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment.

The outpouring of orders followed a week of private conferences by the justices as they decided which cases to add to the more than 70 already scheduled for argument during this nine-month term. Several thousand more cases will arrive during the term, and by February another 70 to 80 will be chosen for review.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.