In the aftermath of Pennsylvania this is becoming an increasingly big topic for the Dems. Sen. Clinton's argument for the superdelegates is "I'm more electable." Sen. Obama's argument doesn't give ground on electability, but, more important, it points out that he has the lead in delegates, states and votes.
Adding to the confusion, Dem Committee Chairman Howard Dean came forward this weekend and said the superdelegates should not worry about vote totals, they should choose the person they think is mot electable.
What are your thoughts?
