- Why a Saudi blogger faces a possible death sentence for three tweets
- America's big wealth gap: Is it good, bad, or irrelevant?
- Xi Jinping, future Chinese president, faces test on first White House visit (+video)
- Iran accuses Israel of setting up attacks on its own diplomats
- Valentine's Day: cost of romance rising for flower delivery, 4 other things
- No budget? No problem! The strange politics behind a budgetless America.
Emboldened Pakistani militants seize, then abandon, fort on bordernear Afghanistan
The attack is a setback for the Army and is raising concerns ahead of next month's elections.
(Page 2 of 2)
The fort was manned by the Frontiers Corps, an 80,000-strong paramilitary force recruited from local tribesmen. The US military has announced plans to train and equip these forces as part of a strategy to counter militancy in the semiautonomous tribal region, said The Globe and Mail.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
02.14.12
Iran accuses Israel of setting up attacks on its own diplomats -
02.13.12
Bali nightclub bombings suspect stands trial -
02.10.12
Pressure for Western intervention in Syria builds with fresh assaults (+video) -
02.09.12
US drone strikes in Pakistan on rise again -
02.08.12
Argentina says it will take Falklands question to the UN
Reuters reports that Navy Adm. William Fallon, head of the US Central Command, said Wednesday that he believed Pakistan was ready for greater US counterinsurgency assistance. But he gave no details of that support, which is politically sensitive in Pakistan, where many strongly oppose the deployment of US troops. Admiral Fallon said he was encouraged by his conversations with Pakistan's new Army chief, Gen. Ashfaz Kayani, who took over in November after President Pervez Musharraf resigned from the post.
"I was very heartened by his understanding of what the problems are and what he's going to need to do to meet those, so we want to try and help that," said Fallon, who plans to visit Pakistan later this month.
Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday that Defense Secretary Robert Gates fears inexperienced NATO troops are using inappropriate tactics to contain Taliban forces in southern Afghanistan. In an interview, Mr. Gates said NATO troops weren't properly trained for counterinsurgency operations. His comments follow a recent decision to deploy temporarily 3,200 US Marines in the south in response to rising violence there.
Gates has publicly criticized European allies in the past for failing to send adequate numbers of troops and helicopters to the Afghan mission. But concerns about strategy and tactics are usually contained within military and diplomatic channels.
… [Southern Afghanistan] is controlled by a 11,700-soldier NATO force largely made up of the British, Canadian and Dutch forces. Britain saw 42 soldiers killed last year, almost all in southern Afghanistan, its highest annual fatality count of the war; Canada lost 31, close to the 36 from that country killed in 2006. American forces lost 117 troops in 2007, up from 98 in 2006, but U.S. forces are spread more widely across Afghanistan.
A US government spokesman said Thursday that Gates' comments were targeted at all NATO members, reports Britian news agency The Press Association. The conciliatory statement came as some European allies reacted angrily to a perceived slur on their troops. A lawmaker called Gates's comments "bloody outrageous" while the Dutch government called in the US ambassador for a clarification.
[Editor's note: The original headline misidentified the location of the Pakistani fort.]


Previous






These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.