Subscribe

It's 'melting': A window on Pentagon construction spending in Afghanistan

Building a replica of an Afghan village, with Afghan construction workers and Afghan materials, proved too tough a task.

  • close
    The "dry fire" training facility in Wardak Afghanistan in Feb 2013, 4 months after completion.
    SIGAR/NPTC Mentor
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

The Pentagon and State Department's vast spending programs in Afghanistan have come in for a lot of flack over the years. Perhaps one of the greatest mistakes was the tens of billions of dollars sunk into trying to build a US-style military for a country that will eventually have to support it on an Afghanistan-sized budget.

There's a long list of shoddy efforts. A $60 million improvement program at a hydroelectric power plant that reduced the power supply. A $70 million garrison built for Afghan troops that began to collapse soon after completion, with the Afghan soldiers forced to live in tents. Or $7 billion spent on opium eradication only to see opium production soar to record heights.

Often, critics have focused on American failures to take into account local capabilities, culture, and potential sustainability when building such large-ticket items. Like a $300 million power plant designed to run on fuel Afghanistan can't afford, and which requires complicated maintenance Afghans can't yet provide.

"Make it Afghan, for Afghans," is often the advice from old development hands.

But that hasn't happened much, according to a report released yesterday by the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR).

The Pentagon hired a local construction firm with a simple task: Create a replica "typical Afghan village" with local building materials and local laborers. The cost? A relative bargain at $500,000. The facility, in Wardak, is next to the National Police Training Center and was designed to be used as a "dry fire" (no live bullets) training range for Afghan Special Police to hone skills in searching villages for weapons, criminals, and insurgents. 

Within four months of completion in October 2012, however, the facility was "melting," in the words of SIGAR. The audit found that a lack of oversight and a corrupt local contractor meant the use of shoddy materials and workmanship throughout, leading to the creation of a facility that was too hazardous to the lives of the Afghan police for use within six months of completion. Two years later, roofs had collapsed, walls had crumbled, and water was seeping into almost all the foundations.

The local knowledge needed to oversee the building of a series of simple Afghan homes was beyond the Pentagon. The Afghan government demolished the site and has started over with its own money (though its budget is largely financed by the US and other donors). 

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK