After massacre in Syria, Russia and China veto UN resolution
The past 24 hours have been one of the bloodiest of Syria's war, with government forces indiscriminately shelling the restive town of Homs over night. Russia and China were unmoved.
Afghans are living longer? Yes, but not thanks to NATO
Afghanistan pushes to stone adulterers? You shouldn't be surprised.
This just in: Totally unbelievable thing is absolutely untrue
Does Iran nuclear deal pave way for Syria compromise? Not so fast. (+video)
Another dubious conspiracy theory that won't die: Lockerbie bombing
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
But in the last 24 hours Assad's regime unleashed a series of assaults across the country that opposition groups insisted amounted to indiscriminate targeting of unarmed civilians. They claim more than 200 killed since yesterday afternoon, though reporters with contacts on the ground have begun to speculate the death toll is exaggerated.
Worst hit was Homs, were activists said parts of the city were turned into free fire zones by government troops seeking the latest set of army defectors who fled into the city. Frightening footage made its way out of Homs to back their assertions, including a group of bound and mostly naked armed men, found murdered in a home in the city.
The carnage in Syria promised to make this morning's UNSC showdown more explosive, and some Syrian activists hoped it would move Russia and China toward at least an abstention. The two powers voted in favor of the first UNSC resolution on Libya last year, and abstained from voting on the second, which authorized the use of international force.
But the activists were disappointed. When the vote on the resolution came, 13 hands went up in support, including South Africa, Brazil and India, which had opposed UN action in Libya. China and Russia went the other way.
Those votes from South Africa, Brazil and India were just one of the indications of Syria's growing international isolation. Tunisia announced today it was expelling the Syrian ambassador, and Algeria looked to be moving in that direction as well.
But with two veto wielding members of the UNSC digging in, it's hard to measure what diplomatic isolation means. That the two states held firm was far from surprising. Russia in particular has been vocal in proclaiming that it felt tricked by UNSC Resolution 1973 on Libya, which led to a sustained NATO bombing campaign in support of the uprising against Muammar Qaddafi. Russia says it expected armed action would only be taken to protect the civilian population, and that the armed and coordinated support from NATO for the rebels, who won their war, went far beyond the UN mandate.
Determined to not allow that to happen again and concerned about the precedent that such actions set, Russia insisted that it would only support a resolution that explicitly ruled out regime change or eventual armed intervention (which was not in the cards in the current resolution). Russia also sought language in the resolution that would appear to put Assad's opponents, who appear to be developing a growing number of armed militias, on equal footing with the regime. Russia's UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said Russia had asked for language demanding the "Syrian opposition must distance themselves from resistance groups using acts of violence," but was turned down, in explaining his country's veto.