Wikileaks, new US report fuel controversy about Iraq's PM

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, under scrutiny for torture implications in the Wikileaks Iraq dump, raised US concerns after he moved to put Iraqi Special Forces under his control.

By , Correspondent

  • close
    In this Oct. 20 photo, Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki speaks during a news conference after a meeting in Cairo, Egypt.
    View Caption

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's move to take control of Iraqi Special Operations Forces trained and funded by the US is raising concerns over how those forces will be used, according to a new US government report released Monday.

The report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction could fuel controversy surrounding the incumbent prime minister, who is already grappling with Wikileaks' release of 400,000 low-level US military documents that imply forces under his offices command committed war-crimes during his four-year term.

This appears to be the first direct acknowledgment by a US agency of a move that has been widely known but so far ignored publicly by the US, which was responsible for reconstituting Iraqi forces. It could raise questions about the US role in creating an elite commando unit transferred unconstitutionally to the command of a Shiite-dominated prime ministry in the height of a brutal sectarian war.

Recommended: Default

IN PICTURES: Wikileaks and the war in Iraq

The report by the federal agency set up by Congress to monitor the spending of billions of US dollars in Iraq also said that despite $7.3 billion spent on an unprecedented police training program, the capability of those forces is unknown because no system has been put in place to assess them.

Timing of Wikileaks release politically motivated?

Mr. Maliki has claimed that the timing of the Wikileaks release is part of an attempt to undermine his chances of forming a coalition government. The trove of "sigacts" – the daily raw military data of "significant actions" over the course of six years of war – includes reports of security forces identified as under the command of Maliki's office committing crimes.

None provides evidence that Maliki knew of abuses committed by forces answering to him. But they provide a snapshot of a savage sectarian war that included secret prisons attached to government ministries and death squads linked to security forces.

The US military has condemned the release of the documents and said it will not comment on secret files.

Some seek to limit Maliki's power in a second term

On Sunday, Iraq’s highest court said the political vacuum which has left the country without a functioning parliament was unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to meet in the next two weeks to elect a speaker.

Maliki and his political rivals have hoped to use the speaker position to entice coalition allies in a package deal to form a government, seven months after elections. Other Shiite parties have proposed that the prime minister’s powers be curbed if Maliki leads a new government.

Since he came to power in 2004, Maliki has consolidated several security organizations under his command, either changing their command structures or creating new organizations that bypass the Ministry of Defense or Interior and answer directly to his office.

Those include Iraqi Special Operations Forces.

“Recent GOI [government of Iraq] decisions create concerns about whether the ISOF [Iraqi Special Operations Forces] is appropriately positioned within the GOI to ensure its independence and legitimacy,” says an assessment by the Special Inspector General released Monday.

How Maliki brought special ops forces under his control

Iraqi special forces until 2006 had been part of the Ministry of Defense, a structure recommended by the US which kept the elite but often undisciplined Iraqi troops in the military chain of command. It also "protected them from political influence,” the US report said.

“However starting in late 2006, the Prime Minister issued three Executive Orders that significantly changed the structure from the one that the US advisers had envisioned and recommended.” The changes placed the 4,100-strong force responsible for counterterrorism directly under the command of the prime minister. An attempt to retroactively seek approval from parliament for the change was never approved.

“The Special Ops program trained and equipped 4,100 special ops soldiers, providing essential counterterrorism capabilities,” the report said, noting that the special forces were now capable of conducting operations and missions and sustaining equipment and facilities. “But the total cost of the program is unknown, and the extra-constitutional movement of the Special Ops forces from the Iraqi Ministry of Defense to the Office of the Prime Minister raises concerns about how the forces will be used in the future,” the report said.

No US assessments made on $7.3 billion police program

In an accompanying report, the agency said the US since 2003 has spent about $7.3 billion in an unprecedented program conducted during ongoing combat to help the Iraqi government train, staff, and equip Iraqi police forces.

“The DOD [Department of Defense] reports that over 400,000 Iraqi police have received training and are on the force. However, the capabilities of these forces are unknown because no assessments of total force capabilities were made,” it read.

In lessons it said could be applied to police training programs in Afghanistan, it also criticized weak program management that it said “undoubtedly led to inefficiencies and waste.”

As the US transfers responsibility for training police from the military to the State Department next year, it also noted that the company contracted to train the police, DynCorp International, would be essentially reporting on its own performance.

“These reports need monitoring to check the validity of the information and to ensure police advisers are productively employed,” it recommended.

IN PICTURES: Wikileaks and the war in Iraq

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...