Subscribe

NATO plans upgrades to counter a less predictable Russia

New measures expected to be rolled out at a defense ministers' meeting Thursday include a larger 'Response Force' and a greater command presence in the Baltics and Eastern Europe.

  • close
    Outgoing US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon in January. With NATO officials calling Russia more unpredictable now than during the cold war, alliance defense ministers on Thursday, are expected to approve further measures to enhance NATO's ability to deter and, if necessary, respond to military threats from Moscow, officials said.
    Cliff Owen/AP/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

With NATO officials calling Russia more unpredictable now than during the cold war, alliance defense ministers on Thursday are expected to approve further measures to enhance the organization's ability to deter or respond to military threats from Moscow.

Adam Thomson, Britain's permanent representative to NATO, predicted alliance commitment that will demonstrate "NATO is strengthening its military posture in response, in particular, to the challenge that Russia's behavior represents."

As outlined by NATO officials, key decisions expected at the Brussels gathering of US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and his counterparts from the other 27 NATO member countries include:

— Upgrading NATO's Response Force to make it bigger, more capable, and more quickly deployable. Now 40,000-strong, it has been sent into action just once — for earthquake relief 10 years ago in Pakistan — and has been deemed unfit for NATO's current needs.

— Getting firm commitments from some of NATO's European members for the new and fastest-moving element of the Response Force, "the spearhead," which officials say will include around 5,000 land-based troops.

— Securing an official go-ahead to establish small NATO command-and-control facilities in the three Baltic republics — Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania — and in Poland, Romania, and Bulgaria to improve coordination and planning.

—Expanding a multinational headquarters in Poland to play a key role in defending NATO territory in northeastern Europe.

All this comes as hundreds of new Russian aircraft, tanks, and missiles are rolling off assembly lines and Russian jets are roaring through European skies. While most Russian economic sectors face a 10 percent cut this year as the country heads into recession, the military budget rose by 33 percent to about 3.3 trillion rubles (some $50 billion). The buildup reflects President Vladimir Putin's apparent readiness to raise the ante in a showdown with the West over Ukraine.

Douglas Lute, US ambassador to NATO, said Hagel would make a formal announcement on Thursday, but he expected the United States will deploy American military officers to all six new command and control centers in Eastern Europe and contribute as well as to the corps-level headquarters in Szczecin, western Poland.

As for the spearhead force, Lute said the United States, instead of contributing ground troops, will chip in with things such as airlift capacity to transport soldiers and gear, or intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.

The NATO ministers' meeting is the first since President Barack Obama and other NATO leaders met in September and ordered an overhaul of the alliance's capabilities and defense posture to take into account Russia's annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu insisted the actions already underway or planned by the alliance were defensive, proportionate, and in keeping with its international commitments.

"It's only normal for a collective defense alliance such as NATO to make sure that it does everything it needs to do to protect and defend its allies," Ms. Lungescu said.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK