Delhi protests throw caste debate into the spotlight

Jat farmers brought India's capital to a standstill this week with their protests seeking 'backwards caste' benefits, a common tactic in modern India. 

|
Adnan Abidi/ Reuters
Jat women shout slogans as they block the Delhi-Haryana highway near Haryana, India on February 22. For several days, the Jat community has protested, trying to win recognition as a group needing affirmative action policies. The demonstrations have killed more than a dozen people and disrupted Delhi's water supply.

A caste of farmers pushing for "backwards" status have reached an agreement with Indian officials, ending a violent days-long protest that disrupted Delhi's roads and water system while intensifying debate over India's longstanding affirmative action programs.

Thousands of troops were sent to quell four days of unrest stirred by members of the Jat community, who number around 80 million. They want the government to classify Jats as "Other Backward Classes" (OBC), a designation originally intended to help groups at the bottom of the social ladder compete for government jobs and university places.

Demonstrators blocked highways and a canal supplying 60 percent of public water in Delhi. At least 16 people were killed, and more than 100 injured. By Monday evening, however, the city and surrounding districts were attempting to return to normal after government officials promised to consider the "backwards" designation.

"The government has promised to meet our demands and we have promised our full cooperation," organizer Ramesh Dalal told Reuters.

Since independence in the late 1940s, India's Constitution has set aside quotas for "scheduled classes" as a riposte to centuries of discrimination against certain tribes and Dalits, known as "Untouchables." Occupying the bottom of India's Hindu caste system, they had long been barred from taking part in some religious rituals and from preparing food for other castes. 

But as Indian society and its economy has developed, so have notions of "caste," fueling a debate about class, caste, and wealth as more and more groups call for help under the official "reservation" system. 

"Yes, we are in charge, but it’s not about the past, it’s about the future," a retired Jat banker told the Washington Post as he protested alongside Jat farmers. "Of course we were the main landholders in the state but land is shrinking, land has been divided. If a family has a small plot of land, it’s very hard for them to survive."

Some groups pushing for recognition are considered middle-class, such as the Patels, whose protests erupted into similar violence last August. They complain that poorer groups now have an advantage in competition for jobs and universities, and believe their newer struggles make them equally deserving of protection. 

"Either free the country from reservation, or make everybody the slave of reservation," student leader Hardik Patel said at the time.

In 1990, the government extended recognition and quota benefits to groups outside the "scheduled castes," creating the category of "Other Backwards Classes." Today more than 40 percent of Indians are OBCs, while researchers are trying to determine what positive effect, if any, the reservation system has had for India's poor and marginalized. 

"Caste is very much alive — why pretend otherwise?” Business Standard political editor Aditi Phadnis told the Monitor during the Patel protests. 

Economic development and affirmative action have boosted a sliver of targeted groups, but social stigma exists nonetheless, seen in caste-specific marriage ads and ongoing village traditions. 

Although India's founders aspired to build a more equal society, caste-based politics may have done the opposite, as politicians grasp for ways to capture votes in a huge and diverse country. Some 47 percent of college-educated adults in Karnataka state, for example, home of Bangalore, say caste influences their vote.

It's not the first time Jats have demanded OBC status. In 2015, the Supreme Court turned down a congressional move to include them, ruling that neither "self-proclaimed" marginalization, nor caste alone, should determine the setting aside of reservations for public posts or universities.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Delhi protests throw caste debate into the spotlight
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2016/0222/Delhi-protests-throw-caste-debate-into-the-spotlight
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe