England, Wales ban water cannon use by police. How do UK police tactics compare globally?

Home secretary Theresa May is worried about medical risks the water cannon may cause, especially 'without safeguards' to regulate its use.

|
Stefan Wermuth/Reuters
Britain's Home Secretary Theresa May addresses the Police Federation's conference in Bournemouth, southern England, Britain on May 20, 2015.

The British Home Secretary has prohibited the use of water cannon as a means of crowd control in England and Wales, according to the BBC.

Water cannons are used in Northern Ireland, but have never been used in the rest of the UK, the BBC reports.

Most recently, law enforcement officials deployed water cannons to “patrol sectarian flashpoints at the climax of Northern Ireland’s marching season” on Monday, according to The Guardian.

London Mayor Boris Johnson, who is said to be unhappy with the ban, had authorized £218,000 for the purchase of three water cannons a year ago, according to The Guardian.

Home secretary Theresa May, who initiated the ban, told the BBC that, while the use of water cannons was "unlikely to result in serious or life-threatening injuries", there were still "direct and indirect medical risks," including spinal fracture, concussion, eye injury and blunt trauma.

A statement by the Met Police defended the potential use of water cannons, saying: "We believed allowing police the option of deploying water cannon, even though they would be seldom seen and rarely, if ever, used, was a sensible precaution which would allow us to deal with a number of specific public disorder situations more safely and effectively than we are currently able."

Britain actually has a very limited track record when it comes to fatal police incidents.

In 2014, the British police force killed one person – a man who was threatening a woman with a knife, according to The Guardian. This was the first time police shot someone to death since 2011.

This is in stark contrast with the United States.

According to citizen-run database Killed by Police, which provides links to media reports for each death, US law enforcement officers have killed 620 people so far in 2015. Last year they killed just over 1,100.

A 2014 investigation by The Wall Street Journal found that hundreds of police killings in the US aren’t even counted in federal statistics.

When it comes to non-lethal police weapons, some countries have gone beyond tear gas and rubber bullets.

India, for instance, became the first nation to use weaponized drones for crowd control in April. The machines are “used to shower pepper powder on an unruly mob,” says Yashasvi Yadav, chief of police in the northern Indian city of Lucknow, where the drones have been tested.

Most countries permit the use of non-lethal weapons for crowd control, but ban their use in warfare, as delineated by international law – the 1925 Geneva Gas Protocol and the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross.

A 2015 report by the American Civil Liberties Union analyzed the potential dangers that can come allowing American law enforcement to use what are called “less lethal” weapons.

They recommended the US “apply rigorous government standards for the design and use of such weapons, which would include an assessment of the risk of death and serious injury, specific training required, and what contexts police can use them in.

Home Secretary May said "without safeguards," water cannon had "the capacity to cause harm," according to the BBC.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to England, Wales ban water cannon use by police. How do UK police tactics compare globally?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/0715/England-Wales-ban-water-cannon-use-by-police.-How-do-UK-police-tactics-compare-globally
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe