US military report shares blame on NATO bombing of Pakistani soldiers (VIDEO)
Relations between US and Pakistan have soured so much that the report on the NATO bombing is likely to have little effect. Instead, Pakistanis fret about rumors of a possible military coup.
(Page 2 of 2)
As Monitor correspondents Issam Ahmed and Owais Tohid wrote in a May 2 story, Bin Laden’s presence a few hundred yards away from Pakistan’s military academy – nicknamed Pakistan’s West Point – gave suspicions that some members of Pakistan’s government must have known he was there. Yet while opinion polls show that only 9 percent of Pakistanis “liked” Bin Laden and 80 percent disliked him, the attack by US soldiers on Pakistani soil became transformed into a debate over Pakistani sovereignty.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
12.31.11
2011 Reflections: Suddenly, a new era in the Middle East -
12.30.11
2011 Reflections: the end of a landmark year for Latin America -
12.30.11
2011 Reflections: Africa rises, taking charge of its affairs -
12.30.11
How the 'Year of the Protester' played out in Europe -
12.30.11
In Prague, a tale of communism past
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
US investigators in the NATO bombing incident say that it should have been clear to the Pakistani soldiers that they were firing on a US-Afghan coalition force and should have stood down.
Brig. Gen. Stephen Clark, an Air Force special operations officer who led the investigation, told reporters at a press conference that there was "an overarching lack of trust between the two sides" that prevented Pakistan and the US from giving each other specific details of their troops’ movements and locations.
Yet while the US appears to be attempting to set their relations with Pakistan back on course, a scan of Pakistani papers this morning shows that Pakistanis themselves have much bigger concerns. Most Pakistani papers lead with stories about rumors of a possible military coup.
In the Daily Times, Tanveer Ahmed quotes a "tirade" by Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, warning the Army not to launch a coup.
“Conspiracies are being hatched to pack up the elected government,” Gilani told a gathering at the National Arts Gallery. He did not specifically blame the military, but later in the day he made clear in a speech to parliament that the army must operate under the control of the government. “They have to be answerable to this parliament,” Gilani said. “They cannot be a state within a state.” He called the army “disciplined”, saying that they “follow the constitution” and “will remain under the government”.
In Dawn, a Reuters agency story reports that Pakistan Army Chief Gen. Ashraf Kayani told troops that the Army will continue to support democracy, and that coup rumors were just “speculation.”
And in the Nation, Pakistan’s Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry assured citizens that coups were not likely, since disputes could now be settled in a court that was trusted to be independent.
"Past are the days when the courts used to endorse unconstitutional measures; instead, we are sitting here to safeguard the Constitution," Justice Chaudhry was quoted as saying.
For the US and NATO, the worsening of relations with a frontline ally and the domestic instability within that country are both threats to the logistical flow of supplies to their bases in Afghanistan. More than half of all non-military supplies -- items like clothes, and food, and medicines -- are trucked through Pakistan after being offloaded at the Pakistani port of Karachi. But Pakistan banned any further shipment of NATO and US military supplies after the bombing raid. Thursday's investigation report will do little to change that.
IN PICTURES: Osama bin Laden death: reaction
Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.



Previous

These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.