In Australia, Aborigines and government face off over sacred spot
The government of the Australian state of Tasmania is moving ahead with plans to build a bridge – straight through land containing Aborigine artifacts.
Hobart, Australia
• A local, slice-of-life story from a Monitor correspondent.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
05.24.12
Whose Islands are they? South Korea tries branding in its dispute with Japan -
05.24.12
Report: Russian intelligence suspects US hand in SuperJet crash -
05.24.12
Russia claims new missile can overcome missile defenses -
05.23.12
Pakistan jails doctor who helped find bin Laden: why the US may not intervene -
05.23.12
Amid eurozone turmoil, Germany borrows money for free
To residents of Hobart, the capital of Australia’s island state of Tasmania, a grassy flood plain bordering the Jordan River, was nothing special until archaeologists uncovered a treasure-trove: an estimated 3 million artifacts dating back 40,000 years.
The spot had been an important meeting place for Aboriginal tribes, and the tools, stones, and spear tips found there represent the oldest evidence of human habitation in the Southern Hemisphere.
But the Tasmanian government is pressing ahead with plans to build a bridge – part of a new four-lane highway – over the river. The government claims the construction will not threaten the riverbank’s hidden riches. But an Aboriginal leader, Michael Mansell, has labeled the project “cultural vandalism,” saying the white colonial sites like Port Arthur, the former convict settlement, would never be disturbed.
Three major tribal groups are believed to have traded goods and held traditional ceremonies here. Aborigines were still living on the flood plain as late as 1828, 25 years after Europeans colonized Tasmania. Most of the island’s indigenous population was wiped out during the settlement process. The archaeologist who led the dig, Rob Paton, wrote of the site: “It has the potential to give us a glimpse into an unknown part of world history and the spread of Homo sapiens across the earth.”
The government says it has examined eight alternative routes, but none are viable.









These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.