Vienna ranked best city in world; Baghdad worst
Mercer's 2010 Quality of Living Survey ranks 221 cities, with Vienna at the top, Baghdad at the bottom, and Honolulu as the best in America. But the list of best places to live arguably values comfort over dynamism.
Vienna topped the list of best city in world, Baghdad at the bottom. Seen here, thousands of athletes pass a bridge over the Danube river shortly after the start of the Vienna city marathon, Vienna, Austria, on April 18.
Ronald Zak/AP
Boston
US cities failed to crack the top 25 list of world's most livable cities, according to a recent survey that ranks Vienna as the best and Baghdad as the worst places to live in the world.
Skip to next paragraph-
Gallery: Best and worst cities to live in
Recent posts
-
12.28.12
Putin signs antiadoption law, throwing pending adoptions into confusion (+video) -
12.27.12
India gang rape spurs national dialogue -
12.22.12
Deep emotions run beneath Russia's adoption ban -
12.22.12
Good Reads: gun laws, lottery winners, online education, and tech gets sensory -
12.20.12
End of the world on 12/21/12? Not just yet, says the Vatican's top astronomer. (+video)
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The world’s top three cities are all in Central Europe, with the former seat of the Habsburg Empire sitting firmly at the top for two years in a row, according to the 2010 Quality of Living Survey by London-based Mercer, an international consulting company. The lakeside Swiss cities of Zurich and Geneva rank second and third.
In Pictures: Best and worst cities to live in
In the US, the highest ranking entry is Honolulu at No. 31, followed by San Francisco at 32. Singapore (28) is the top-scoring Asian city followed by Tokyo at 40. The best city in the Middle East is Dubai (75); the best in Africa is Port Louis in Mauritius (82).
Baghdad, ranking 221, remains at the bottom of the list, well behind a string of low-ranking African cities.
But Mercer's rankings, and others such as that put out by the Economist Intelligence Unit, fail to truly capture what makes a great city, writes Joel Kotkin in Forbes magazine:
"It seems to me what makes for great cities in history are not measurements of safety, sanitation or homogeneity but economic growth, cultural diversity and social dynamism.... Just think about the great cities of history – ancient Rome, Islamic Baghdad, 19th century London, 20th century New York – or contemporary Los Angeles, Houston, Shanghai and Mumbai.









These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.