Sarah Palin urges Israel settlement expansion, attacks Barack Obama
Sarah Palin calls for an expansion of Israel settlements – challenging 40 years of US policy – in an interview with Barbara Walters. Palin also criticizes Barack Obama for urging an Israeli halt.
(Page 2 of 2)
The administrations of Presidents Nixon, Johnson, Ford, Carter, and Clinton all considered the annexation of land seized in 1967 illegal. President Ronald Reagan took a position that some might be legal, but opposed their expansion. Prior to becoming president, as the US ambassador to the UN, George H.W. Bush called the settlements illegal. His son, President George W. Bush, thought natural growth for existing settlements was fine, but was opposed to new ones.Skip to next paragraph
2011 Reflections: Suddenly, a new era in the Middle East
2011 Reflections: the end of a landmark year for Latin America
2011 Reflections: Africa rises, taking charge of its affairs
How the 'Year of the Protester' played out in Europe
In Prague, a tale of communism past
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Her comments are drawing criticism from editorial writers and Israeli peace groups. "It turns out that we've got it all wrong in the Middle East,'' writes Dallas Morning News editorial writer Tod Robberson. "Despite the fact that every U.S. president since Jimmy Carter has recognized the damage done by Israel's illegal settlements in the West Bank, Sarah Palin says the solution is simply to butt out.... Stay tuned for her solution to global warming: Burn more coal."
American-Israeli peace activist Noam Shelef, writing at the website of Americans for Peace Now, writes: "Those of us who care about Israel and peace cannot afford to simply dismiss Palin's comments. Palin's statements are likely to become the new conservative line of attack against President Obama's efforts to bring peace to Israel. Gov. Palin may not be aware of it, but every American president in the past 40 years -- Republican and Democrat alike -- has opposed West Bank settlements. They have done so because settlement expansion is bad for American national security interests and because they have cared about Israel's well-being."
Writing on Foreign Policy magazine's blog Blake Hounshell writes the "settlements are hugely problematic for peace" and that her position amounts to "supporting an Israeli policy that all serious people understand to be deeply corrosive to the prospects for peace and to Israel itself."
Jeremy Ben-Ami, executive director of J Street (a pro-Israel lobbying group in DC that favors a negotiated peace settlement), said in a press release that "Palin's pandering to her right-wing base comes at the expense of the security of the State of Israel, the lives of those actually living the conflict, and the fundamental American interest in achieving a two-state solution in the near term."
Gov. Palin has not said yet if she will challenge for the 2012 Republican nomination, and she has shown some recent flexibility on her views on American foreign policy, so there's no guarantee this will be her position if she decides to get back out on the campaign trail. But for the moment she's also urging Obama to send more troops to Afghanistan.
"We need essentially a surge strategy in Afghanistan, so that we can win in Afghanistan," Palin told Walters. "And that means more resources, more troops there. It frustrates me and frightens me and many Americans that President Obama is dithering around with the decision in Afghanistan."