Why African countries are boycotting climate change talks
UN climate change talks in Barcelona have stalled as African countries say the world's rich nations must do more to cut emissions.
(Page 2 of 2)
"Africa is heavily impacted by climate change," says Christian Lambrechts, a policy coordinator for the United Nations Environment Program in Nairobi. Africa has experienced some of the world’s highest warming trends, and its relatively poor citizens are living so close to the very edge of subsistence that when major climate changes occur, large numbers are unable to adapt, and must simply move to other areas, he says. "Put all this together, and you can understand why this is an important issue."
What are the solutions?
Identifying the problem is one thing. Coming up with a solution is quite another. Addressing climate change requires that both developing and developed nations give something up by cutting back on electricity produced with “dirty” fuels such as oil, natural gas, and coal and switching to more expensive but environmentally friendly methods such as wind power, solar, and geothermal.
2011 Reflections: Suddenly, a new era in the Middle East
2011 Reflections: the end of a landmark year for Latin America
2011 Reflections: Africa rises, taking charge of its affairs
How the 'Year of the Protester' played out in Europe
In Prague, a tale of communism past
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
It is the richer nations that have been producing greenhouse gases for decades, African leaders argue. It is richer nations, too, that have the financial resources to clean up their acts, and it is the richer nations that need to make greater sacrifices.
The Kyoto Protocol, signed by some 184 nations to date, bound all nations to reduce their carbon emissions up to 2012, and current talks aim to extend the cutback in emissions until 2020 and beyond. At the time the Kyoto Protocol was being debated, the United States accounted for a staggering 36 percent of all the world’s carbon emissions. But the US itself, which signed the Kyoto Protocol but has not ratified it, is not bound by the commitments other nations face in cutting carbon emissions. Many US economists and politicians argue that emission targets will hurt the American economy and eliminate jobs and will be meaningless as long as fast-developing nations such as India, China and Brazil continue to increase their own emissions.
"On the one hand, you have richer nations that want to maintain profligate lifestyles, and nobody wants to change their habits, and they want us to remain poor by regulating our emissions and telling us we can’t industrialize," says Alex Alusa, the climate change coordinator for the Kenyan Prime Minister, Raila Odinga. "That is not fair."
"Every country needs to develop, to improve the lot of their own people, and that means we have to industrialize, and then to consume, and consumption leads to emissions," says Mr. Alusa. The richer nations need to recognize that poorer nations will increase their emissions, he adds, and that it is the richer nations who must bear the greater burden for switching to cleaner and more expensive energies.