Obama, Gates defend move to scrap Bush missile shield
President Obama and defense secretary Robert Gates fired back at conservatives and security hawks who have decried the decision as a dangerous capitulation to Russia.
(Page 2 of 2)
Obama weighs in
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
05.29.12
Russian security firm spots cyber supervirus that tops Stuxnet -
05.29.12
With a mouse click, an expat casts his French vote, from Beijing -
05.24.12
Whose Islands are they? South Korea tries branding in its dispute with Japan -
05.24.12
Report: Russian intelligence suspects US hand in SuperJet crash -
05.24.12
Russia claims new missile can overcome missile defenses
President Obama followed up Gates's words by firmly addressing the issue during interviews for the Sunday morning talk shows.
"The Russians don't make determinations about what our defense posture is," Obama told CBS. "If the by-product of it is that the Russians feel a little less paranoid ... then that's a bonus."
"Russia had always been paranoid about this, but George Bush was right. This wasn't a threat to them," Obama said, adding that it would be a bonus if the Russians were "now willing to work more effectively with us to deal with threats like ballistic missiles from Iran or nuclear development in Iran."
Will Russia cooperate on those issues? That's the million-dollar question.
Early indications aren't bad.
Mr. Putin described Obama's decision as "correct and brave." Russia announced this weekend that it would scrap plans to deploy missiles near Poland.
And as Iran's nuclear program again becomes a focus in coming weeks, it should become apparent just how hard a line Russia is willing to take on Iran.
The world will be watching for signs when Obama meets this week with Russian President Dimitry Medvedev in New York where both are attending the UN General Assembly.
No one should hold his breath, however.
As the Monitor reported last week, the issues are not easily solved.
“It may be that Russia will be more amenable, but this is a deeply complicated issue,” Fyodor Lukyanov, editor of Russia in Global Affairs, a leading Moscow foreign policy journal, told the Monitor. “On Iran, and other regional conflicts, the differences between Moscow and Washington are deep, and that hasn’t changed.”
Meanwhile, critics at home continue to hammer Obama's decision.
"I find it alarming and dangerous that this president has abandoned our friends in Eastern Europe to curry favor with our foes in Russia," 2008 presidential contender Mitt Romney told the Reuters news agency on Sunday.
"This is just the latest chapter in Barack Obama's 'Capitulation & Appeasement Tour 2009.' " screams an editorial in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. "Not only has the administration caved to the Russians for nothing in return, it dangerously downplays Iranian capabilities at the exact moment others are ramping up the threat. ... The bottom line is that the United States has made yet another bad decision in pursuit of coddling its enemies and shafting its allies."
– Material from the wires was used in this report.



Previous






These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.