Western envoys: Expect run-off in Afghanistan election
The Paris meeting today was seen as an effort to pressure incumbent President Hamid Karzai amid the review of more than 1,000 complaints of voting fraud.
(Page 2 of 2)
A report by Dexter Filkins of the New York Times this week describes a case near Kandahar of a local tribe that was prevented from voting – but that 23,900 ballots, all marked for Karzai, were shipped to Kabul the evening of the elections. Mr. Eide in Paris said the story itself was proof of a main message the envoys wished to send, “that this was a better election than five years ago. Five years ago that story would not have been possible to report.”Skip to next paragraph
2011 Reflections: Suddenly, a new era in the Middle East
2011 Reflections: the end of a landmark year for Latin America
2011 Reflections: Africa rises, taking charge of its affairs
How the 'Year of the Protester' played out in Europe
In Prague, a tale of communism past
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The election count, aided by some 3,000 donkeys, Eide said, has been slow. But the Paris gathering expressed respect for the “democratic whisperings” in the country, as Mr. Kouchner put it.
On Tuesday the French foreign ministry stated that the military presence added to the Afghan mission to aid the elections would stay until the security situation was resolved. Eide stated that “four to five” Afghan police are killed each day, which makes recruiting new policemen difficult.
Source of counted votes unclear
What remains unclear ahead of the expected results on Sept. 17, according to a Pashtun journalist contacted by phone, is whether or not the current votes that have Karzai leading by a slim margin, have been tallied from the north or south of Afghanistan. Abdullah Abdullah, half ethnic Tajik and half Pashtun, has a stronger base in the north, and Karzai in the Pashtun south. If votes still to be counted are mainly from the south, the outcome is seen to favor Karzai.
But the journalist, who covered the elections and asked not to be named for security purposes, argued that applying Western or international standards to the Aug. 20 elections are misguided. He says, as the envoys did, that the nation should be graded by how well it improved over the 2004 vote. A nation that is struggling, with toxic ethnic divides, a pre-modern infrastructure, tribal, where the Taliban and drug lords are active and at war – can’t be judged by first world standards. “I’m not sure Afghanistan can even be compared to a third-world election standard yet,” he said
Ballot count should be quicker than in Minnesota
Amid reports of a deteriorating military fight with the Taliban in general, Holbrooke offered that “On Aug. 20 [the election date] the Taliban failed.... They said they would destroy the elections, and they didn’t.
He said that voting irregularities take place “even in democracies that are not at war,” and said an outcome would not wait as long as the six months it took to decide the recent Senate race in Minnesota.