Why are Britain and Germany at such odds over EU's top job?

The fight between Angela Merkel and David Cameron might look like it's just about prospective EC President Jean-Claude Juncker. But it's not.

|
Maja Suslin/TT News Agency/Reuters
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte (l.), Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt (2nd from r.), and British Prime Minister David Cameron (r.) listen as German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks during a joint news conference at Reinfeldt's summer residence in Harpsund, south of Stockholm today.

The current argument between Britain and Germany about who will lead the European Commission may seem like a turf war over Brussels.

But the contest – which remained at an impasse today – has implications far beyond the leadership of the EU institution itself, and could directly impact both Britain's role in the EU and the bloc's cohesion in the face of growing Euroskepticism.

EU leaders have, until now, named the commission head on their own, but with new rules aimed at greater transparency, they are now set to “take into account” the party representation in the EU parliament. What that actually means is still subject to debate, though the ultimate decision will be taken by the EU leaders with a majority vote. No one country can veto it, so Britain needs to get others on board if it is to resist Germany's choice.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has thrown her weight behind Jean-Claude Juncker, the former prime minister of Luxembourg, to head the powerful EC. He hails from her alliance of center-right parties in Europe, the European People’s Party. The EPP garnered the best overall results in EU parliamentary elections in May, bolstering Mr. Juncker's candidacy. 

But British Prime Minister David Cameron fears that Juncker would push for deeper political union in the EU to prevent another crushing debt crisis. This would hamper Mr. Cameron's efforts to reform an EU that he recently called “too big” and “too bossy.”

At the same time, a protracted power struggle would test the bloc's unity, which is already being challenged by a surge in anti-EU sentiment manifested in last month's elections. 

Mrs. Merkel and Cameron's differences were on display today in Sweden, where both leaders met ahead of an EU summit on June 26 and 27.

"I have said that for me, Jean-Claude Juncker is the candidate for the office of Commission president and that I want to have him as the Commission president," Merkel said at a news conference in Sweden.

Although her words are no surprise to Cameron, they show the uphill battle he faces in trying to push for reform of the EU. He has said that, if re-elected in next year's British parliamentary elections, he would give Euroskeptic Brits the chance to decide via referendum if they want to remain in the 28-member bloc.

At the news conference, Cameron suggested that it might make it harder for Britain to stay within the EU if Juncker is selected. For her part, Merkel said threats shouldn’t be part of the process and go against the spirit of the EU.

Neither Merkel nor Cameron can afford a confrontation. Merkel is much stronger with Britain as a firm ally within the EU. And Cameron needs Merkel, as the most powerful leader of Europe, to bring about his new vision of Britain in Europe.

In fact, no mainstream leader can risk renewed signs of division. Setting aside differences to present a clear and common agenda is key to bringing Europeans on the fence back to the EU fold. But with so much at stake for both, a confrontation might be hard to fend off.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why are Britain and Germany at such odds over EU's top job?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2014/0610/Why-are-Britain-and-Germany-at-such-odds-over-EU-s-top-job
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe