Vatican taken to task by UN on child abuse. Will the church change?

Victims' rights advocates say that they hope today's unprecedented grilling in Geneva of Vatican officials could be a turning point for the church's handling of abuse.

|
Martial Trezzini/Keystone/AP
Vatican Ambassador to the UN Monsignor Silvano Tomasi (l.) speaks with former Vatican Chief Prosecutor of Clerical Sexual Abuse Charles Scicluna prior to the start of a questioning over clerical sexual abuse of children at the headquarters of the office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva today.

Vatican officials came in for an unprecedented grilling today by a United Nations committee over the Catholic Church's cover-up of decades of sexual abuse of children by clergy.

But despite familiar defenses from the Holy See concerning its role in child-abuse scandals, victims and their advocates are hopeful that the shame of being questioned in public could propel significant change within the church.

The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in Geneva posed charged, blunt questions to senior Vatican officials today, the first time that they had been called to defend their record on the rape of thousands of children by clergy in front of an international body. The Catholic Church ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1990 but failed to provide the required progress reports for more than a decade, with victims’ groups accusing the church hierarchy of fostering a culture of secrecy to hide abuse of children by priests, monks, and nuns in countries around the world, from Italy and Ireland to the US and Australia.

"Why is there no mandatory reporting to a country's judicial authorities when crimes occur?" asked Hiranthi Wijemanne, a member of the committee. "Taking actions against perpetrators is part of justice."

Another member, Sara Oviedo, was equally forthright. "The Holy See has not established any mechanism to investigate those accused of perpetrating sexual abuse, nor to prosecute them.”

Committee members also asked the Vatican delegation what plans it had to collect data on clerical sex abuse, what oversight was in place for Catholic institutions such as schools and orphanages, and how it trained priests to work with minors.

'The Holy See gets it'

Addressing the hearing, Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican's representative in Geneva, showed a degree of remorse, saying that "such crimes can never be justified."

Archbishop Charles Scicluna, a prelate from Malta who for a decade was the most senior Vatican official in charge of dealing with sexual abuse cases, acknowledged that the church had made mistakes in the past.

"The Holy See gets it, let's not say too late.... There are certainly things that need to be done differently," he said. "It is not the policy of the Holy See to encourage cover-ups. Only the truth will help us move on to a situation where we can start being an example of best practice."

But Archbishop Tomasi reiterated an argument that the Vatican has long used – that the Holy See cannot be held responsible for the actions of clergy members in countries around the world and that its remit extends only to those living and working within the Vatican City State – the tiny sovereign territory surrounded by Rome, where fewer than 40 children reside.

Priests were "not functionaries of the Vatican but citizens of their countries and fall under the jurisdiction of their own countries," he said.

That argument was condemned as dishonest by campaigners for victims of sexual abuse, who said it was clear that the Vatican is the hub of the worldwide Catholic Church and issues directives and orders to dioceses around the globe.

“It is just so disingenuous for Church officials to claim that national governments are responsible for prosecuting clergy when those same Church officials have obstructed justice, helped predator priests move jurisdictions, destroyed evidence, and paid off victims and witnesses to remain silent,” says Barbara Blaine, a victim of abuse herself and the president of the US-based Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP).

'Vindicated'

Despite the Vatican official's familiar arguments in Geneva, some campaigners saw a glimmer of hope in the public inquiry.

“It feels like a new chapter of justice and transparency has been opened,” says Megan Peterson, a member of SNAP and a victim of abuse as a child in Minnesota. “It’s a historic day for me.”

Miguel Hurtado, also from SNAP, said that in the past he and fellow campaigners had been called “Catholic haters who want to destroy the Church” by senior clergy. “We feel vindicated by the UN committee and we hope the Vatican will change its approach.”

The UN committee, which is composed of independent experts, will issue a report on Feb. 5. Its recommendations are not binding and the committee has no ability to sanction the Vatican, but it could still spur the Vatican into action, activists said.

“Whether the Vatican makes hard changes remains to be seen,” says Pam Spees, a human rights attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, which provided a key report to the committee. “Nonetheless, today’s hearing is a milestone in calling for an end to the days of impunity."

“People are waiting and watching and there is now a standard by which they will judge the Vatican," Ms. Spees adds. "I think we are seeing a shift and monitoring by international bodies can only be a good thing.”

Key papal test

The degree to which the Vatican tackles the issue of sexually abusive clergy is being seen as a key test of the papacy of Pope Francis, who was elected last March after the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI. Pope Francis has announced almost weekly initiatives to reform the Holy See’s governance and clean up its finances, but has said little about the shame of predatory priests.

Last month he announced the setting up of a committee to address the issue, but victims’ groups described the initiative as “toothless,” “meaningless,” and “like offering a Band Aid to a cancer patient.”

On Thursday, as the UN session was underway in Switzerland, he told worshipers at morning Mass in the Vatican that abuse scandals had "cost us a lot of money, but [paying damages] is only right."

Bishops, priests, and lay people were responsible for this "shame of the Church," he said.

"Do we feel shame? There are so many scandals that I do not want to name them individually but everyone knows about them," the Argentinean pope said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Vatican taken to task by UN on child abuse. Will the church change?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2014/0116/Vatican-taken-to-task-by-UN-on-child-abuse.-Will-the-church-change
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe