Golden Dawn: five things to know about Greece's 'neo-Nazi' party

Golden Dawn, a far-right, racist political party in Greece, has been the target of a major crackdown by the Greek government. Why?

How common is violence like Golden Dawn's in Greek politics?

Aris Messinis/AP/File
Alexandros Giotopoulos (c.), wearing a bullet-proof vest, is escorted by anti-terrorist police officers outside a court house in Athens in July 2002. Mr. Giotopoulos was convicted in 2003 of being the leader of the Revolutionary Organization 17 November far-left terrorist group.

Unfortunately, it is not uncommon. Between 1967 and 1974 the country was ruled by a right-wing military junta, from which Golden Dawn claims continuity. (Ironically, the junta's 1967 rise to power – by arresting politicians and military figures – was the last time a Greek party leader was arrested before today.)

Greece also has an active far left. After the war, the country came very close to aligning with the Soviet Union, with a vicious civil war fought from 1946 and 1949 between the US- and British-backed military and the Greek communist party.

Later, far-left terrorist groups appeared, including the Revolutionary Organization 17 November (17N), initially fighting military rule.

Named after a 1973 university uprising, 17N engaged in a campaign killing and kidnapping for decades, including the Dec. 23, 1975, assassination of Richard Welch, the CIA's station chief in Athens. Until 2002, Greek police had not arrested a single member of what was one of Europe's most elusive terrorist organizations. But that year, a government crackdown saw the arrest of several members of the group, including leader Alexandros Giotopoulos, who worked as an academic.

In 2007, another group, Revolutionary Struggle, fired a rocket propelled grenade into the US Embassy in Athens. Since 2008, anarchists have attempted to firebomb car dealerships and banks. 

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.