Does Andy Murray's Wimbledon win boost Scottish independence?

Probably not. But it's not as remote a connection as you might think.

|
Anja Niedringhaus/Reuters/Pool
British Prime Minister David Cameron (c) and Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond (r) cheer on Andy Murray during the men's singles final tennis match at the Wimbledon Tennis Championships in London. Both Britain and Scotland claim Mr. Murray as their own – even as the latter debates leaving the former to become an independent state.

On Sunday afternoon, moments after Scotsman Andy Murray defeated Novak Djokovic to win the Wimbledon crown, a Scottish flag was unveiled in an unlikely place: the Royal Box at Center Court of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club. The bearer of the flag – which is also known as the "Saltire" – was Scotland’s first minister, Alex Salmond.

Directly below the Scottish National Party leader stood his UK counterpart, Prime Minister David Cameron, seemingly oblivious as cameras captured him celebrating the first British victory in the men’s singles for 77 years against the blue and white backdrop of the Saltire.

The Saltire would become the flag of an independent Scottish state if Scots vote yes in a referendum on leaving the United Kingdom next September. 

"The Saltire is our national flag, Andy [Murray] is a fantastic, magnificent Scottish sportsman, anybody has got the right to wave the national flag, it's a great way to celebrate this amazing triumph," Mr. Salmond told the BBC’s "Good Morning Scotland" program Monday.

But is Mr. Murray’s Wimbledon win a boon for Salmond and the nationalists, or does it attest to the enduring power of the union?

David McCrone, a sociologist at Edinburgh University who has studied Scottish and British identity, says that tennis success is unlikely to have a significant bearing on next year’s vote.

"I don’t think [Murray winning at Wimbledon] will have a long-term political effect," he says.

However, in a series of studies of national identity in Scotland, Dr. McCrone did note something he calls "the Andy Murray factor."

"We asked people if they got annoyed when Andy Murray is described as British when he wins and Scottish when he loses," he says.

The results were overwhelmingly affirmative – suggesting a particularly strong sensitivity to questions of Murray's Scottishness – and "way, way ahead," he says, of responses to similar questions concerning Scottishness and Britishness, such as if Scots were annoyed when Queen Elizabeth is described as "Queen of England," rather than of Britain.

Scotland has a long history as a distinct sporting entity. The first international soccer match was between Scotland and England in 1872, and Scotland has its own teams in rugby, cricket, and myriad other sports. Scotland provided the first British winners of the European Cup (now the Champion’s League), Glasgow Celtic, in 1967.

Scotland, though, is part of the UK in some sporting arenas, most notably the Olympic Games. Better Together, the campaign for a "no" vote, has held up last summer’s Olympics in London – when the Team GB won 29 gold medals – as an example of the strength of British identity. Earlier this year, Scottish cyclist Chris Hoy, who won six Olympic gold medals, said he was worried about Scottish athletes’ ability to establish themselves if Scotland were to vote "yes" in 2014.

What it means to be British in Scotland has changed over the past 30 years, with increasing numbers of people saying they feel more Scottish than British, says McCrone. The London Olympics are unlikely to change that pattern.  

"What all these politicians banging on about British identity tells you is that there’s a problem with it. If [British identity] was so secure they wouldn’t have to keep going on about it," he says. And Scottish and British are not mutually exclusive identities, he added. Many Scots say that they feel both, to differing degrees.

Sport could yet play a role in deciding the outcome of the 2014 referendum. Next July, less than two months before the referendum, Glasgow will host the Commonwealth Games, in which separate teams from England and Scotland will compete.

The Commonwealth Games could "inject pride in national identity which, if played carefully," says McCrone, "may have a long-term impact politically."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Does Andy Murray's Wimbledon win boost Scottish independence?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2013/0708/Does-Andy-Murray-s-Wimbledon-win-boost-Scottish-independence
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe