Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Cameron's EU veto stirs discontent (VIDEO)

British Prime Minister David Cameron today defended his veto of greater EU fiscal integration as a protection against London's financial sector.

(Page 2 of 2)



Unnecessary veto?

In the end, Cameron's veto – for which he has risked such discord at home – may have been unnecessary to thwart the Lisbon changes, since they must still be ratified by the 17 eurozone countries.

Skip to next paragraph

“I don’t think last Friday will have too much of a bearing because I don’t think the eurozone countries will ratify the agreement," says Simon Tilford, chief economist at the pro-Europe Centre for European Reform. “There was no need for David Cameron to veto the deal, because it won’t affect the UK because we’re not in the euro – and if anything, [the veto] will make things worse. Admittedly the whole euro crisis has not been dealt with well, which has played into the hands of euro-skeptics, but I think the veto issue will become irrelevant if the euro falls apart.”

But, he adds, it's important for the UK to signal that it remains engaged with the negotiations over Europe's financial crisis.

"There are too many parliaments involved and there’s a need for urgency which isn’t there, so I’m not optimistic the euro will survive in its current form," he adds. “If that happens, the EU will become a very different body and the UK will need to be involved in the negotiations and not seen as isolated.”

UK's first step toward the exit? Not clear.

As for Cameron's standing at home, Tim Knox, director at the right-leaning Centre for Policy Studies, says the prime minister's veto will put more pressure on the Liberal Democrats than his own Conservatives.

“This could break up the coalition but equally it could break up the Lib Dems. They don’t seem to have made their mind up whether the use of the veto was a good or bad thing,” says Mr. Knox, who adds he is unsure whether it means the UK will eventually leave the EU.

“It’s the beginning of something but I’m not sure yet if it’s the beginning of the end of our membership," he says. "I think Friday was more about moving [around] the constitutional furniture and less about solving the problems with the euro – they still need to raise hundreds of billions of pounds of bonds to shore up the currency and this agreement has done absolutely nothing to deal with that.”

Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today. 

Permissions

Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story