Ukraine tense as Tymoshenko moves to contest vote
Yulia Tymoshenko was refusing to concede her narrow defeat by Viktor Yanukovich in Sunday's Ukraine elections. Many say it's doubtful she can prove violations of fraud in the brief period allowed for court challenges.
(Page 2 of 2)
Mr. Paniotto, one of Ukraine's best-known pollsters, says it's unlikely that Yanukovich's forces engaged in any significant vote-rigging. "In this election, the exit polls closely matched the final result," he says. "That's a very strong indicator that the elections were legitimate."
Skip to next paragraphSupporters of Yanukovich are furious with what they see as Tymoshenko's intransigence. They point out that, even after all the bitterness and turmoil of the Orange Revolution in 2004, Yanukovich gracefully conceded his own narrow loss to Viktor Yushchenko, following an unprecedented third round of voting.
"Tymoshenko is acting irrationally," says Vadim Kolesnikov, a parliamentary deputy with Yanukovich's Party of Regions. "Maybe she's trying to look like a martyr? This is no good for her, or for Ukraine."
But other experts insist that there were too many reports of irregularities in Sunday's voting to let the matter go.
"Tymoshenko is right, there has to be a recount, especially in the [eastern Ukraine] where Yanukovich won over 90 percent of the votes in many places," says Oleg Soskin, director of the Institute of Social Transformation, an independent Kiev think tank.
Would an investigation serve democracy?
And some argue that, despite the well-intentioned appeal from international observers for Tymoshenko to concede, Ukraine's struggling democracy might be better served by a full investigation of the fraud allegations.
"In the United States, candidates use the courts to solve election conflicts, and no one suggests it means the end of democracy. Why shouldn't Ukraine be allowed to do the same?" says Tammy Lynch, an expert with Boston University's Institute for the Study of Conflict, Ideology, and Policy.
"Rather than condemning this process, the West should be congratulating all of Ukraine's politicians for a good campaign, a systemically fair election and a commitment to use legal channels to resolve disputes," she says.
Tymoshenko's political problems may be just beginning.
Yanukovich's Party of Regions holds the largest bloc in the 450-seat Supreme Rada, with 175 seats, and it is currently in opposition to the ruling coalition, which comprises the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc (156 seats), the pro-presidential Our Ukraine (76) and ex-speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn's bloc (20).
Mr. Kolesnikov says that talks are underway aimed at cobbling together a fresh, pro-Yanukovich coalition that would mount a vote of no confidence, as early as Thursday, against the incumbent prime minister, Tymoshenko, and her cabinet.
Yanukovich has repeatedly declared that, once elected, he will move swiftly to remove his old rival from government altogether.
Some experts say that might not be such a big tragedy for a politician who has always given her best performance from the outside of Ukraine's establishment.
"Tymoshenko overdramatizes this struggle, as if it were the final battle between good and evil," says Oleksandr Sushko, research director for the Institute for Euro-Atlantic Cooperation, an independent Kiev think tank.
"It would be better to see this as just another election and remain calm about the result," he says. "In this case it's obvious what Tymoshenko needs to do: Go back to the political drawing board and return to opposition."



Previous







Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube