Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

New US military transport contract aims to end diversion of money to Taliban

The military's new transport and supply contract in Afghanistan is meant to stop US funds from being diverted to warlords and the Taliban. But many Afghans fear the damage is already done.

By Correspondent / August 17, 2011

In this Jan. 17, 2010 file photo, a convoy of trucks carry US equipments in Kabul, Afghanistan. In a recent report, the US military estimates that a large portion of the $70 billion invested by the US government on combat support and reconstruction contracts in Afghanistan has ended up in the hands of the Taliban.

Musadeq Sadeq/AP/File


Kabul, Afghanistan

After nearly a decade of war in Afghanistan, the US military has taken steps to restructure its transport and supply contract so American money is no longer indirectly diverted to the insurgency.

Skip to next paragraph

The new contract, a deal between the military and 20 separate trucking and supply companies, is worth nearly $1 billion and is “specifically designed to minimize the risk of contract corruption by increasing the number of prime vendors and by providing better transparency at the sub contractor level,” says a US military official in Kabul familiar with the issue. Most importantly, the new contract aims to cut out middlemen and powerbrokers who have long created problems for Afghanistan.

The move marks a significant step for the American military in Afghanistan. It may also help to check the power of a new generation of warlords who have become millionaires from providing security to American convoys and who often undercut the democratic institutions the US is working to establish here.

Among Afghans there is much relief that the US has begun taking steps to change its contracting policies, but many say that they fear the damage has already been done.

“After 10 years the American government finally woke up about this issue. For a decade we’ve been telling them that something is going wrong with their security and logistics,” says Massoud, a professor of economics at Kabul University who, like many Afghans, only goes by one name. “It is not only good because it is decreasing America’s expenses, but it also stops funding for the Taliban.”

Poor monitoring of US funds

In recent months, several reports from various US government agencies have been released that reveal a pattern of spending in Afghanistan with minimal, if any oversight.

Most recently, a report issued late last month by the Special Investigator General for Afghanistan Reconstruction found that a large portion of the $70 billion invested by the US government on development here may have gone to Afghan militants due to weak monitoring practices.


Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story