Nano stalled as India juggles factory vs. farm
Tata Monors hasn't resumed production of its $2,500 car, even though protests against the Nano factory ended Sunday after farmers were promised more compensation.
The protests that threatened the roll-out this year of the world's cheapest car, the Nano, ended after archrival politicians in the Indian state of West Bengal reached a last-minute deal Sunday.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
But the future of the Nano – as well as the broader issue at the heart of the upheaval – remains unresolved. Construction of the Nano did not resume Monday. Tata Motors, maker of the Nano, said it was not convinced that there is "a long-term congenial environment for smooth operations."
The statement underlines the depth of emotion surrounding the question that ignited the agitation in West Bengal and persists elsewhere: How should uneducated farmers be compensated when their land is taken for India's industrial growth?
It is a topic that straddles the fault line of new and old India – new megaprojects that bring fabulous wealth to a few but few benefits to local farmers, who lack the skills to work there. When these two worlds meet, and farmers feel compelled or coerced into selling their lands, the result is anger and, occasionally, violence.
Last week, Tata shut down its Nano plant in Singur, citing "continued confrontation and agitation at the site."
The deal struck Sunday between West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya and his main political rival, Mamata Banerjee, seemed to remedy this. She called off her protesters; he agreed to find 220 acres of land for the displaced farmers who refused the government's compensation package.
Despite a $350 million investment in Singur and hopes of rolling out the Nano next month, Tata said Monday that it would not yet reopen the plant because of "limited clarity on the outcome of the discussions between the state government of West Bengal and the representatives of the agitators."
The protests against the Nano facility, which involved a blockade of the plant, are but one example – and hardly the most extreme – of how industry and land rights have conflicted in India.
In another part of West Bengal last year, protests led to a clash in which 14 people were killed and cadres of the state's ruling Communist party were accused of rape and brutality. Residents of Nandigram opposed the state's decision to allow an Indonesian firm to build chemical plants there. The plans were later dropped.
Earlier in 2007 in the state of Orissa, four engineers from the South Korean steel producer Posco were abducted for a day by villagers opposing the project. More recently, locals have begun squatting on government land transferred to the company to stop construction.
Tata has had to cancel two steel projects in Orissa due to local opposition.
The issues are twofold. On one hand, many of the conflicts involve India's "tribals," indigenous groups who live a subsistence lifestyle in India's remotest forests. These lands also happen to be India's richest trove of minerals, and as mining companies move in, tribals are being displaced from the only life they have ever known.