Skip to footer

Hong Kong activists march ahead of vote on electoral package

Hong Kong's legislature is due to begin debate on the package on Wednesday with a vote due by the end of the week. Beijing has proposed a direct vote for Hong Kong 's next leader in 2017, but only pre-screened, pro-Beijing candidates will be allowed to stand.

|
Tyrone Siu/Reuters
Pro-democracy protesters shout during a march to demand lawmakers reject a Beijing-vetted electoral reform package for the city's first direct chief executive election in Hong Kong.
  • By Yimou Lee Reuters

| Hong Kong

Thousands of people took to the streets of Hong Kong  on Sunday to protest against electoral  reforms approved by Beijing to choose the city's next leader, the beginning of several days of demonstrations before the reforms go to a vote.

Beijing has proposed a direct vote for Hong Kong's next leader in 2017, but only pre-screened, pro-Beijing candidates will be allowed to stand.

Hong Kong's pro-democracy protesters say that makes a mockery of China's pledge to eventually grant universal suffrage in the territory.

Protesters, some wearing yellow shirts and carrying yellow umbrellas, symbols of their pro-democracy movement, marched from Victoria Park in the bustling shopping district of Causeway Bay to government headquarters.

"We want to say 'no' to the government's proposal," said student Cleo Chui, 21.

"This is not what Hong Kong people want. The election committee does not represent the voice of Hong Kong – it's pre-screened. That's not real universal suffrage."

Pro-democracy activists demanding free elections staged sit-ins late last year, paralyzing parts of the financial hub for weeks to press their demand for free elections.

Daisy Chan of Civil Human Rights Front, which organized Sunday's march, said it was the last chance to fight for democracy.

Hong Kong's legislature is due to begin debate on the package on Wednesday with a vote due by the end of the week.

Supporters of the Chinese government, some waving the Chinese flag, dotted the demonstration route. The two sides shouted insults at each other as scores of police stood by.

There was no violence.

Hong Kong reverted from British to Chinese rule in 1997, under a "one country, two systems" formula that gives it substantial autonomy and freedoms, with universal suffrage promised as an "ultimate goal."

But Beijing fears Hong Kong's aspirations for full democracy spilling over into the mainland.

The number of protesters was less than the 50,000 organizers had hoped for on a sweltering, humid day with temperatures hovering around 86 degrees Fahrenheit.

At least 5,000 officers will be on duty when the vote takes place, senior police sources have told Reuters, adding that the demonstrations could be much bigger and more angry if the package is passed.

Despite worries about a fresh wave of pro-democracy protests, senior Chinese officials have privately expressed confidence that Hong Kong will adopt the package, which will need two-thirds of the 70-seat house, or 47 votes, to pass.

Hong Kong's 27 pro-democracy legislators have vowed to veto it.

(Additional reporting by Venus Wu, Viola Zhou, and Stefanie McIntyre)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Hong Kong activists march ahead of vote on electoral package
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2015/0614/Hong-Kong-activists-march-ahead-of-vote-on-electoral-package
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe