Fearful of cyberspooks, China struggles to break its Microsoft habit

Revelations of NSA surveillance via US-supplied hardware and software have stirred China to put up barriers. But replacing a ubiquitous PC operating system is easier said than done.

|
Mal Langsdon/Reuters
A lock icon, signifying an encrypted Internet connection, is seen on an Internet Explorer browser. China is pushing back against American IT companies following revelations of NSA spying on China and US criminal charges filed in April against five Chinese military officers accused of hacking into American companies to steal trade secrets.

As Beijing and Washington trade accusations of cyber-espionage, China is trying to curb some of America’s biggest information technology firms here. But it is a long way from breaking its dependence on giants such as Microsoft and IBM, local analysts say.

That means that though Beijing has been talking tough in recent weeks – lashing out at US companies that China says have helped the National Security Agency to spy on Chinese officials and citizens – its options are few.

“There have always been efforts [by China] to displace western technology,” points out Duncan Clark, chairman of BDA, a Beijing-based consultancy specializing in the tech sector. “But there have been no local alternatives.”

Since Edward Snowden’s revelations about the NSA’s massive data collection programs, Chinese officials have complained bitterly that Beijing has been a prime victim of US cyber-espionage. The US Department of Justice, meanwhile, last month unsealed indictments against five Chinese military officers, accusing them of hacking into US companies’ computers in order to steal trade secrets.

That prompted quick retaliation. China said foreign technology companies would be vetted for possible national security breaches – a move that could hit US firms’ sales in the biggest PC market in the world.

A few days earlier China had announced that it would forbid the use of Microsoft’s Windows 8 operating system on government computers; the state-run Xinhua news agency said the decision was designed “to ensure computer security” without further explanation.

At the end of last month, Bloomberg News cited four sources as saying that government agencies are pushing Chinese banks, which are largely state-owned, to replace their IBM servers with a locally made brand.

And as the website of the ruling Communist party’s youth wing decried what it called Cisco’s “disgraceful role” in China as a tool of the US government, the Chinese authorities released a report finding that “the nine major US software and hardware providers offer core technology support to US intelligence.”

Microsoft OS upgrades

Microsoft's ubiquitous software is widely used – and pirated – in China. It is not clear which operating system the Chinese government will choose to replace Windows XP, the outdated OS that most government computers currently run on but which Microsoft no longer supports.

Windows 7 appears the only option, since Chinese scientists have not managed to develop an operating system to match Microsoft’s products. But it raises the same dilemma: Should China's government rely on a software platform that is US designed and controlled?

A news item broadcast on state-run television last week questioned Windows 8 security and warned that “whoever controls the operating system can control all the data on the computers using it.”

China has developed its own homegrown platform: computers in some branches of the Chinese military and a few government departments run on an operating system developed by a Chinese firm, Zhongbiao. But it is less stable than Windows and has made little headway in the consumer marketplace says Dai Xiangjun, a security expert at CCID, a Beijing IT consulting firm.

“It is hard to say” when a local firm might develop a computer operating system to rival Windows, adds Mr. Dai. “But it will take a long time.”

Servers for bankers

Likewise, no Chinese firm has yet built a high end mainframe server that could compete with IBM products, meaning that the reported order to replace IBM servers in Chinese banks with servers built by Inspur, a Chinese company, is an empty threat, for now.

Inspur’s spokesmen did not respond to calls for comment, but staff in the sales department could not name any company product that might compete with IBM’s mainframes.

“Core banking operations and mission-critical systems can only run on IBM servers,” says Wang Pei, a cyber-security analyst at IDC, another Chinese IT consultancy. “Inspur does not have the same technology.”

Though the Chinese authorities are worried about their cyber-security, says Mr. Wang, their recent angry words and actions “are a response to the Snowden scandal and the five PLA officers being charged,” he believes. “These are tit for tat reactions.”

“These have been a rough few weeks for US technology companies,” says Mr. Clark. “I hope it turns out to be more rhetoric than reality.”

Dai expects it will. “80 percent of all this is because of US-China politics and 20 percent is about technological concerns,” he says. “The technological problems are actually not hard to solve, but the politics can get very complicated.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Fearful of cyberspooks, China struggles to break its Microsoft habit
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2014/0611/Fearful-of-cyberspooks-China-struggles-to-break-its-Microsoft-habit
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe