Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Why the confusion over how long the plane flew?

Malaysia officials denied a report that Flight 370 flew for four hours after disappearing. It was the second time in a day that authorities had rejected an apparent breakthrough.

|
Wong Maye-E/AP
Malaysia's Minister of Transport Hishamuddin Hussein takes questions from the media during a press conference about the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner MH370, Thursday, March 13, 2014, in Sepang, Malaysia.

Back to square one.

Malaysian officials today categorically dismissed as false two potential leads that could have shed light on the fate of missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 and said investigators had made no progress in determining its fate. 

Six days after the flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing suddenly dropped off the radar, with 239 passengers and crew aboard, its disappearance is one of the most mysterious incidents in modern aviation history. 

A report that data transmitted by the Boeing 777’s engines suggested that the plane might have flown for four hours after it disappeared were “inaccurate,” Transport Minister Hishammuddin Tun Hussein told reporters. 

And an image from a Chinese satellite, published online Wednesday, that appeared to show possible wreckage from the missing aircraft floating in the ocean “was released by mistake and did not indicate any debris from MH370,” Mr. Hishammuddin added.

“Until we have found debris I will never feel we have moved forward” in the investigation, he said. 

The Wall Street Journal, citing unnamed US investigators and national security officials, had reported that data automatically transmitted to the ground from the plane’s Rolls Royce engines indicated that the jet had flown for five hours. According to Malaysian aviation officials, MH370 disappeared from radar screens, and its transponder stopped transmitting, less than an hour after takeoff. The flight departed just after midnight local time. 

The report opened up the dramatic prospect that the plane had flown for several hours undetected in an unknown direction. 

But Malaysia Airlines CEO Ahmad Jauhari said that he had contacted Boeing and Rolls Royce and that they “did not receive any further transmission beyond the transmission that was received at 01.07" on Saturday morning “which indicated that everything [on the plane] was performing normally.”

Neither Boeing nor Rolls Royce has commented on these conflicting accounts of their records.

Hishammuddin also refuted suggestions that Chinese satellite images had identified wreckage from the plane in the Gulf of Thailand, off the Vietnamese coast, where MH370 was last detected.

He said the Chinese embassy in Kuala Lumpur had told him that “the publication of the satellite image was an accident.” Quoting from what he said was a note sent to him by the embassy, he said that “the [Chinese] government neither authorized nor endorsed the behavior that is now being investigated.”

There are now 43 ships and 40 planes involved in the search on both sides of the Malaysian peninsula, and Hishammuddin said that unless they find debris from the plane “we will extend our efforts” into a wider search area. The United States will send the world's most advanced maritime surveillance aircraft, the P-8A Poseidon, to join the search later this week.

Although the search is focused on the Gulf of Thailand and nearby South China Sea, ships and planes are also searching the Straits of Malacca and into the Andaman Sea because Malaysian military radar detected what might have been the plane turning back. Hishamuddin cautioned, however, that the radar “did not indicate what aircraft it was.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Why the confusion over how long the plane flew?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2014/0313/Malaysia-Airlines-Flight-370-Why-the-confusion-over-how-long-the-plane-flew
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe