Who are China's next leaders?

On Nov. 15, the new Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Chinese Communist Party – the group that rules China presented itself to the world. Here are the bios of the seven men who take the reins of China.

3. Zhang Dejiang

Jason Lee/Reuters
China's Vice Premier Zhang Dejiang attends the opening ceremony of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) at the Great Hall of the People, in Beijing, Nov. 8.

Zhang Dejiang has a reputation as the sort of man that China’s leaders trust to take care of a crisis – and to do whatever it takes in the process.

He is rigid, tough, and unquestioning, say analysts who have watched his rise.

Mr. Zhang is unlikely to have broadened his mind much at university: He studied economics at Kim Il-sung Comprehensive University in Pyongyang, North Korea. But his Korean language skills got him a leadership post in Yanbian prefecture, along the border with North Korea, and his success in stemming the tide of illegal immigrants caught Beijing’s eye.

Zhang has been Communist Party secretary in three provinces, including Guangdong in 2003, when SARS broke out there. He tried to keep that epidemic a secret, as his bosses clearly expected him to do, but doing so made it worse. Even a year later he was still trying to clamp down on reports of what had happened: The editor and publisher of a local newspaper that had published a report on the events of 2003 were prosecuted for corruption.

Most recently, Zhang was dispatched to Chongqing to restore the party’s grip on the mega-city after the fall of its charismatic leader Bo Xilai, who had challenged the central party authorities and who is now awaiting trial, accused of a range of crimes from corruption to involvement in his wife’s murder of a British businessman.

Zhang is a safe pair of hands, in iron gloves.

3 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.