A model for conservation in China? The Tibetan antelope

Since the antelope's population plunged to around 70,000 in the early 1900s, its numbers have stabilized at more than 100,000, according to 2009 field estimates by the Wildlife Conservation Society.

Out of all of China's endangered species, the giant panda might be the most recognizable to outsiders. But within China, one of the most iconic conservation battles has been the fight to save the Tibetan antelope, which in the 1980s and '90s was threatened by poachers seeking its silky underbelly wool.

While many conservation campaigns have floundered in China, efforts to protect the Tibetan antelope – which became a touchstone for the country's fledgling citizen environmental movement – have shown some success.

Since the antelope's population plunged from more than 1 million in the early 1900s to just 70,000 in 1995, its numbers have stabilized and rebounded to more than 100,000, according to 2009 field estimates by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), a US-based nonprofit.

The Tibetan antelope, also known as the chiru, is a fine-limbed creature with slender curved-back horns (on males) and distinctively soft downy hair on its underbelly. But illegal poaching emerged as a significant threat in the 1980s, as international demand grew for scarves made from their silky fur. The pelts of antelopes killed in Tibet were sold and smuggled to workshops in India and Kashmir where the wool was woven into luxurious "ring scarves" – so finely textured they could be drawn through a wedding ring. The scarves became a high fashion item from Italy to Dubai.

But the poaching angered the local population. An armed vigilante band of Tibetan activists, dubbed the Wild Yak Brigade, began to monitor areas near antelope breeding grounds. The grass-roots campaign caught the attention of China's public (it was the subject of an epic 2004 film "Kekexili: Mountain Patrol") as well as local authorities, which viewed the activists as a threat. Eventually, the local government disbanded the brigade, but assumed its anti-poaching mission (and absorbed some of its members).

One of the most celebrated wildlife crusaders was a Tibetan activist named Sonam Dorje. In 1994, while patrolling the remote Hoh Xil region, he encountered a caravan of poachers. They shot him from the side of a jeep, in the same drive-by shooting fashion used to kill antelopes. His body lay frozen in sub-zero temperatures for two weeks before he was found and cremated as a hero.

The grisly death inspired his friend, Yang Xin, a nature photographer, to quit his accounting job in Chengdu and found Green River, one of China's first nongovernmental environmental organizations.

Working with Liang Congjie, founder of Beijing's Friends of Nature, he campaigned to raise awareness of the Tibetan antelope's plight through public workshops and write-in campaigns to politicians, including Britain's Tony Blair.

"At that time, China had just begun to have NGOs and the public had just begun to feel concern [for] wildlife," Mr. Yang says. "We also wrote a lot of letters to business people in America. The women never knew that their shawl killed three to four antelopes."

In 1995, George Schaller, a conservation biologist, oversaw a WCS research expedition to make a baseline estimate of the antelope's diminished numbers; his team found the population had plunged to about 70,000.

By 2009, their field research indicated that the population had climbed to "above 100,000," says Kang Aili, a WSC scientist based in Beijing.

In explaining this trend, she said that multiple layers of government – "from the national level down to the county level" – had made a coordinated effort to crack down on poaching.

"The local government first set up Chang Tang Nature Reserve to cover the heart of the antelope's habitat. It's the second-largest land nature preserve in the world and a big commitment."

Later, China's government elevated the 334,000 sq. km (129,000 sq. mi.) region to a national reserve, making funding available to pay for rangers' salaries, patrol jeeps, computers, GPS devices, and training.

"Fifteen years ago," says Ms. Kang, "no one really understood what is conservation – it was a new concept. Today, local people believe it's important."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A model for conservation in China? The Tibetan antelope
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0828/A-model-for-conservation-in-China-The-Tibetan-antelope
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe