Could Snowden make Ecuador's leader 'the new Chávez?'

In championing Snowden, President Correa is further cementing his image as a successor to Chávez who can take on the US.

|
Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr/AP
Journalists stand next to Ecuador's Ambassador's car while waiting for the arrival of Edward Snowden, a former CIA employee who recently leaked top-secret documents about sweeping US surveillance programs, at Sheremetyevo airport, just outside Moscow, Sunday, June 23.
|
Tran Van Minh/AP
Ecuador's Foreign Mister Ricardo Patino speaks to reporters at a hotel during his visit to Vietnam Monday, June 24. Patino said that his government is analyzing an asylum request from Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor wanted for revealing classified secrets.

Just a year after opening his London embassy to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa has another chance to taunt the US government.

Mr. Correa’s administration is weighing a request to grant asylum to Edward Snowden, the man who leaked classified National Security Agency intelligence. Mr. Snowden’s exact plans are unknown – he left Hong Kong for Russia, and Venezuela, Cuba, and Ecuador have all been mentioned as final destinations.

Ecuador’s Foreign Affairs Minister Ricardo Patiño hinted Monday that his asylum request was likely to be granted.

Speaking to reporters in Vietnam, Mr. Patino said the request “has to do with freedom of expression and with the security of citizens around the world.”

If Snowden, who is wanted in the US on espionage charges, does wind up in Ecuador, it will provide Correa with another notch in his anti-imperialist belt. With the March death of Venezuela’s firebrand President Hugo Chávez, Correa is seen as one of the most prominent Latin American leftist leaders to oppose the US. Granting Snowden asylum only raises his standing.

“I do think it makes Correa the new boogeyman in the region for Washington,” says David Smilde, senior fellow at the Washington Office on Latin America. “It makes him the regional personality who is willing to poke the US in the eye.”

Correa has been criticized for limiting freedom of expression, including a far-reaching media law – referred to as a “gag law” by press freedom advocates—approved by Congress this month.

By granting Snowden asylum, Correa can turn the tables on the US in a case that comes down to freedom of information. “It allows him to criticize the criticizers,” says Mr. Smilde.

While less confrontational and less vocal than Mr. Chávez, Correa has a history of standing up to the United States.

In 2009, he threw out a US military base and high-ranking diplomats. In 2011, he declared the US ambassador persona non grata after WikiLeaks published a State Department diplomatic cable alleging corruption. And last year, he took in the founder and spokesman of the WikiLeaks organization. Mr. Assange, who was wanted by the Swedish government for questioning related to allegations of sexual misconduct, has been holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London since June 19, 2012.

None of the previous incidents seriously damaged relations between the US and Ecuador. The Obama administration might view this case with more urgency, says Jonas Wolff, a senior research fellow at the Frankfurt-based Peace Research Institute.

“In spite of all of those issues, bilateral relations have been OK,” Mr. Wolff says.  “In this case, the US position is clearly different. Here, I would expect a reaction from the US.”

Wolff says the US is limited in the severity of its response. The US Congress was already unlikely to renew trade preferences for Ecuador that are set to expire this summer.

“The US doesn’t have too many measures it can utilize, other than to criticize,” he says.

What’s more, the case has been a source of embarrassment for the Obama administration.

“The US does not look very good in this case,” he says.

While the US may pursue an agreement that would bring Snowden home to face charges, Smilde does not foresee a major diplomatic response, such as withdrawing its ambassador. "Logic would tell me that the US will let it blow over once he gets asylum, simply because it’s not a very flattering case for them," he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Could Snowden make Ecuador's leader 'the new Chávez?'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2013/0624/Could-Snowden-make-Ecuador-s-leader-the-new-Chavez
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe