Hugo Chavez: Global reactions to the Venezuelan leader's death

While he was alive, Hugo Chávez – the longest ruling democratically elected leader in Latin America – inspired people who loved him as often as he inflamed those who didn’t. That polarization seemed to follow him in death.

Europe

Eraldo Peres/AP
Workers gather for a tribute to Venezuela's President Hugo Chávez during a march by the Central Labor Union in Brasilia, Brazil, March 6.

In Russia, which maintained warm relations with Venezuela, President Vladimir Putin called Chávez a “great friend” of his country. He is expected to send several close aides to attend the funeral.

Italy’s Corriere della Sera newspaper dubbed Chavez Latin America’s “last caudillo,” while the Spanish daily El País dedicated dozens of articles Wednesday to the news of his death and its impact in Latin America and the world.

An editorial in El País predicted Venezuelan Vice President Nicholas Maduro could win the next election purely on the existing emotional support for his predecessor, but noted that "strongman regimes don't usually survive their icons for long."

The outsized personality of Hugo Chávez and his incomparable capacity to connect with many Venezuelans allowed him to weather the grave problems of his country without cracking politically. But it seems more than unlikely that his successor, whoever it is, will be able to assemble sufficient support to keep citizens tolerating for very long the enormous economic inequality, the everyday scarcity, the deep corruption or the rampant urban violence that afflicts the country... 

Spain Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, who maintained his distance from the late Venezuelan leader, called Chávez “one of the most influential figures in Venezuela’s contemporary history.” 

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.