Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Sudan election: Is Khartoum stealing South Sudan's oil?

As people vote in the Sudan election, a recent report says that $700 million – perhaps much more – may have been underpaid to South Sudan since a 2005 peace agreement mandated the sharing of oil revenues with Khartoum in the North.

By Scott BaldaufStaff writer / April 12, 2010

Sudan election: An election official stamps a ballot paper as women vote in the town of Malakal, Sudan. The three-day election – Sudan's first multiparty vote in a quarter century – will be a key indicator of whether Sudan can fend off renewed conflict and humanitarian crisis as it heads toward a 2011 referendum that could bring independence for the oil-producing south.

Finbarr O'Reilly/REUTERS


Khartoum, Sudan

As Sudanese line up across the country to cast their ballots in the first multiparty Sudan election since 1986, a recent report is bolstering what southern Sudanese leaders have long suspected: that their northern partners in Khartoum have been cheating them out of hundreds of millions in oil revenues.

Skip to next paragraph

The report by the Global Witness transparency watchdog in London says that $700 million – perhaps much more – may have been underpaid to the south since a peace agreement mandated the sharing of oil revenues in 2005.

Using oil production figures published by one of the biggest foreign companies producing oil in Sudan, the Chinese National Petroleum Company (CNPC), Global Witness found that the Chinese reported 12 percent higher levels of production in Blue Nile state in 2009 than what the Sudanese government in Khartoum had reported for the same time period.

IN PICTURES: Sudan elections

The findings came soon after a Sept. 2009 report finding discrepancies between 9 percent and 26 percent between government figures and those of the CNPC in 2008.

“It’s impossible to know which figures are correct, the Sudanese government’s or the oil company’s, but it is clear that both cannot be,” says Rosie Sharpe, a campaigner for Global Witness in London. The lack of accurate data could be dangerous, Ms. Sharpe says, particularly between two well-armed rivals who once fought a 22-year civil war that just ended in 2005 with the power-sharing peace agreement. Part of that peace agreement included sharing oil revenues, but five years of shady numbers have done nothing to build trust between the north and south.

“It’s astonishing that you can have a wealth-sharing agreement, with so much money involved, and not to have transparency mechanisms built into the agreement,” Sharpe says. “The discrepancies vary between 9 percent and 26 percent. Let’s look at the conservative end of that range, at 10 percent. $7 billion of oil money has been transferred to the south since the peace agreement in 2005. That’s $700 million that may have been underpaid.”

Will the south secede?

If South Sudan decides to secede from the rest of Sudan in January 2011, as it is allowed to do by the Comprehensive Peace Agreement it signed with the north, it will have the distinction of being the poorest country on earth, with 90 percent of its residents living on less than $1 a day, with one out of every eight children dying before her fifth birthday, and with the highest maternal mortality rate in the world, according to the report.