Will Russia get kicked out of the Rio Olympics?

A new report reveals that Russia systematically concealed positive drug tests since 2011, further diminishing the country's chances of competing in the 2016 Games.

|
Pavel Golovkin/AP/File
People walk in front of the Russian Olympic Committee building in Moscow in 2015. On Monday, World Anti-Doping Agency investigator Richard McLaren confirmed claims of state-run doping in Russia.

A new report reveals that Russia has been systematically concealing positive drug tests since 2011, confirming what The New York Times once called "one of the most elaborate – and successful – doping ploys in sports history." 

Now, with less than three weeks until the start of the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio, officials must decide whether to let Russian athletes participate. 

In a 97-page report, investigator Richard McLaren found that the country's state-directed cheating program resulted in at least 312 positive results being withheld by Moscow's anti-doping laboratory under the direction of Russia's deputy minister of sports. The withheld positives spanned 28 sports, including track and field, wrestling, swimming, snowboarding, and even table tennis. 

The total number of positives withheld could be higher, Mr. McLaren said, but as the investigation was limited to 57 days, he was only able to examine a total of 577 positive sample screenings.

The "disappearing positive methodology," as McLaren calls it, is said to have begun in 2011, shortly after Russia's disappointing performance at the Vancouver Olympics. The plan was executed with the assistance of Russia's national security service, the FSB, the main successor agency to the Soviet KGB. 

McLaren did not make any recommendations for the future of the Russian team at the upcoming Games, saying it was up to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and others to "absorb and act upon" the content of the report. 

In response, IOC President Thomas Bach said the committee would not hesitate to apply the toughest sanctions possible, calling the program a "shocking and unprecedented attack on the integrity of sports and on the Olympic Games." 

Prior to the report's release, several sports organizations, including the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), announced that they would call for a full ban of the Russian team if the report provided evidence of a state-sponsored doping conspiracy.

On Monday, USADA chief executive officer Travis Tygart said in a statement that the report "concluded, beyond a reasonable doubt, a mind-blowing level of corruption within both Russian sport and government that goes right to the field of play." 

No matter what decision is made by Olympic officials, at least one Russian will compete at Rio as an neutral athlete. As The Christian Science Monitor's Ben Rosen reported last week:

Long jumper Darya Klishina was approved by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) Sunday to compete independent of Russia at international competitions that include the Olympics, subject to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) accepting its decision. The IAAF Doping Review Board found Ms. Klishina, who trains at a Florida sports academy, "meets the exceptional eligibility criteria" because she proved she was not involved in the scandal, and was subjected to drug tests outside of Russia.  

If Klishina competes in the Olympics, she will likely become the first athlete whose country was banned from the competition because of a doping scandal to compete as a neutral athlete there.

The IOC executive board will meet Tuesday to begin discussing the future of the Russian team, the Associated Press reports.

This report contains material from the Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will Russia get kicked out of the Rio Olympics?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2016/0718/Will-Russia-get-kicked-out-of-the-Rio-Olympics
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe