Despite Orlando, Senate will not expand FBI surveillance powers

Civil-liberties groups criticized a Senate bill that would have expanded the FBI's secret surveillance capabilities.

|
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
A U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence holds a hearing on NSA surveillance programs at the Capitol in June 2013.

UPDATED: 3:30 pm Wednesday

A bill expanding the FBI’s ability to monitor telecommunications records without a warrant failed to pass the Senate on Wednesday, in what was seen as a victory for civil libertarians and privacy advocates.

The legislation, filed as an amendment to a criminal justice funding bill, would have broadened the list of records the FBI can request from phone and Internet companies using National Security Letters, which do not require judicial approval and are often accompanied by a gag order mandating secrecy on the part of the recipient. Civil libertarians and electronic-freedom groups have criticized the letters as invasions of privacy. On Tuesday, the ACLU sent a letter to lawmakers calling on them to vote against an expansion of "authorities that have a history of abuse."

The Senate rejected the amendment 58-38, two votes short of the 60 necessary to move ahead with the bill.

Currently, the FBI can use the letters to force a company to hand over users’ phone billing records. The proposal would allow the agency access to records such as the senders and recipients of emails and corresponding timestamps, as well as internet browsing histories.

The bill highlights law enforcement’s struggle to adapt to what they describe as terrorism’s changing nature. In 2010, notes Laurent Belsie of the Christian Science Monitor, then-Attorney General Eric Holder lamented that the threat “has changed from simply worrying about foreigners coming here, to worrying about people in the United States.”

“You didn’t worry about this even two years ago – about individuals, about Americans, to the extent that we now do,” said Mr. Holder then.

Since the 9/11 attacks, some terrorist groups have also changed their preferred strategy, wrote Brookings Institute terrorism expert William McCants in an email to the Monitor last week.

“They, like many other terrorists, used to be fixated on building bombs. But they’ve learned that mass shootings are easier to organize without detection and generate just as much media attention. ISIS has been exceptionally good at inspiring young men to carry out these attacks in its name.”

On Tuesday, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who serves as the second-highest-ranking Republican in the chamber, said the bill would “allow the FBI to collect the dots so they can connect the dots, and that's been the biggest problem that they've had in identifying these homegrown, radicalized terrorists.”

Wednesday vote, while close, underscored a reluctance by lawmakers to introduce new expansions of surveillance since the breadth of the National Security Agency’s spying capabilities were revealed in leaked information from former contractor Edward Snowden.  

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Despite Orlando, Senate will not expand FBI surveillance powers
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0622/Despite-Orlando-Senate-will-not-expand-FBI-surveillance-powers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe