Who will win the federal Smart City Challenge?

Seven US cities this week pitched their ideas for the US Department of Transportation initiative aimed at implementing new technologies into civic systems. The winner will receive funding to kickstart new projects.

|
Larry Downing/Reuters/File
U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx delivers an announcement at the Department of Transportation in Washington in May.

Seven United States mayors this week made the cases for their cities, each hoping to win millions of dollars of federal funding as part of an initiative to create the country’s first “Smart City.”

The US Department of Transportation's (DOT) Smart City Challenge, issued this past December, offers each city the opportunity to claim up to $40 million from the federal agency and millions more from corporate sponsors to update its transportation systems to prepare for the future. DOT Secretary Anthony Foxx in March announced the seven civic finalists in the challenge culled from 78 municipal applicants. The winner will be announced later this month.

Representatives from Austin, Texas; Columbus, Ohio; Denver; Kansas City, Mo.; Pittsburgh, Pa.; Portland, Ore.; and San Francisco, Calif., this week argued their cases as to why their cities should “become the country’s first city to fully integrate innovative technologies – self-driving cars, connected vehicles, and smart sensors – into their transportation network,” according to the DOT challenge.

The program was started in response to the 2015 DOT report, Beyond Traffic, which highlighted the potential future transportation problems of the United States, resulting from a surging population and aging and often ineffective infrastructure. That report concluded that much of the nation is not prepared for future transportation needs, a problem Foxx and the DOT hope the Smart City Challenge can begin to address.

“[F]or most of my lifetime, our transportation system has been on a decline, in terms of our investment, in terms of travel times, in terms of congestion,” Foxx told the Associated Press. But Foxx says he thinks that could change, starting with a progressive smart city that could provide a model for transforming transportation.

“This is going to be an era when transportation is going to literally change in front our eyes,” he said.

The seven cities’ pitches before the DOT this past week more resembled something from a tech investment conference than a typical federal budgeting exercise, highlighting Foxx’s position that the Smart City initiative is “not a normal government challenge;” city officials issued their proposals from a stage while pushing innovation and collaboration.

The ideas presented at the meeting included the citywide implementation of travel planning apps, Wi-Fi access on major transportation routes, support for electric vehicles, updated safety technologies on public transit vehicles, the integration of self-driving buses, and more.

Each of the mid-size cities cited different problems they need to address, and different ways of incorporating government, private companies, and communities into the solution.

“We’re learning from this, too,” Foxx told the AP. “Trying to figure out the technology in isolation is different than trying to understand how we play a role in technologies that cities gravitate toward. It helps us understand more of the specific types of problems cities are trying to tackle.”

Foxx is expected to announce the civic challenge winner soon after the recent meeting, but even after awarding the major grant the six other finalists will not go away empty-handed. The runners-up are each set to receive $100,000 to go toward the initiatives promoted during the competition, and officials hope the planned progress in one or two cities could spark a rapid spread of innovation over the coming years.

“I think the mayors enjoyed being in the temporary role of being competitors,” Portland Mayor Charlie Hales said to CityLab. “We’re normally not. We’re always collaborating … and that will reassert itself after the competition is over.”

The seven cities’ video pitches to the DOT can be viewed on the department’s YouTube channel.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Who will win the federal Smart City Challenge?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0612/Who-will-win-the-federal-Smart-City-Challenge
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe